Affiliation:
1. Perm State National Research University
2. GAU DPO "Institute of Advanced Training – "RMTSPK"
Abstract
In conditions of rapidly changing external environment, increasing international tension, and more complicated public policy, the theory of public administration must quickly adapt. Traditional models of public administration based on strict hierarchical subordination are extremely ineffective, which necessitates their radical rethinking and redesign. These changes affect the requirements for the qualification profile of civil servants. The key trend is the rejection of team management methods in favor of methods based on participation, involvement, effective motivation. The purpose of the study is to analyze the theory of public administration basic concepts (models); to establish the functions and tasks of civil servants and arrange them; to identify key trends in the society development that affect the qualification profile of civil servants. The research is based on scientific works, statistical data of national and foreign agencies and institutes, empirical data. Scientific methods: literature analysis, comparative analysis, synthesis, generalization, observation; methods, used in the article are of scientific abstraction and abstract thinking. The novelty of the research lies in the conclusion that the paradigm of public administration shifts towards social partnership and decentralization of public administration, increasing the responsibility of civil servants.
Publisher
Kemerovo State University
Subject
Applied Mathematics,General Mathematics
Reference40 articles.
1. Needham C., Mangan C. The 21st century public servant. Birmingham: University of Birmingham, 2014, 28., Needham C., Mangan C. The 21st century public servant. Birmingham: University of Birmingham, 2014, 28.
2. Weber M. Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology. Berkley: University of California, 1922, 1469., Weber M. Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology. Berkley: University of California, 1922, 1469.
3. Hood C. A Public Management for all seasons? Public Administration, 1991, 69(1): 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x, Hood C. A Public Management for all seasons? Public Administration, 1991, 69(1): 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
4. Olsen J. P. Maybe it is time to rediscover bureaucracy? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2005, 16(1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui027, Olsen J. P. Maybe it is time to rediscover bureaucracy? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2005, 16(1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui027
5. Hood C., Lodge M. Competency, bureaucracy, and public management reform: a comparative analysis. Governance, 2004, 17(3): 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00248.x, Hood C., Lodge M. Competency, bureaucracy, and public management reform: a comparative analysis. Governance, 2004, 17(3): 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00248.x