Author:
, Erlina Sari Siregar Hasanuddin , Salamiah Sari Dewi
Abstract
The goal of this study was to put each thinking style's predictions on multiple intelligences to the test. Participants are Medan City teachers who were randomly assigned to a sample (n=810) multiple intelligence scale from Gardner (1983) totalling 63 items with a range of 5 scales and a thinking style questionnaire using the Sternberg-Wagner Self-Assessment Inventor from Sternberg (2009) totalling 65 items with a range of 5 scale ranges. Only six of the eight intelligences, such as Interpersonal, Visual-spatial, Bodily-kinaesthetic, logical-mathematical, linguistic-verbal, musical-rhythmic, and harmonic, can be predicted using thinking styles, according to the findings. Meanwhile, in this study, no thinking style can predict intrapersonal or natural. The research findings explain specific thinking styles.
Publisher
UK Zhende Publishing Limited Company
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Research on Japanese Vocabulary Learning Recommendation Methods Based on Data Intelligence Analysis;2024 Second International Conference on Data Science and Information System (ICDSIS);2024-05-17
2. The Use of Apriori Algorithm in Digital Campus Web Data Mining;2023 3rd International Conference on Smart Generation Computing, Communication and Networking (SMART GENCON);2023-12-29
3. Research on Adaptive Learning Model of Higher Vocational Education Under the Background of Artificial Intelligence;2023 3rd International Conference on Smart Generation Computing, Communication and Networking (SMART GENCON);2023-12-29
4. Design Research of Computer Design Assistance Systems;2023 World Conference on Communication & Computing (WCONF);2023-07-14