Perception of a multidisciplinary team on physical restraint use on older adults: care paradoxes

Author:

Andrade Maria Risiane da Silva1ORCID,Couto Marcia Bastos1ORCID,Carvalho Ana Carolina Siqueira de1ORCID,Barros Patricia de Fátima Augusto1ORCID,DelValle Romulo1ORCID,Santana Rosimere Ferreira1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Universidade Federal Fluminense, Brazil

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the perception of a multidisciplinary team on the use of physical restraint in older adults. METHODS: Qualitative research conducted with 58 health professionals in two long term care facilities for older adults located in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Semi-structured interviews were further analyzed using thematic content analysis. The data was collected from November 2017 to June 2018. RESULTS: Twenty-one initial codes were identified and organized in three categories: team perception of the consequences and risks of a physical restraint (the patient’s safety paradox); implications of the decision of physical restraint of the older adults; and strategies to restrain and not restrain. CONCLUSIONS: The results reinforce the need for training of professionals on restraint-free alternatives of care, as part promoting a culture of care that respects the right to freedom and the dignity of people — especially the most vulnerable ones.

Publisher

Sociedade Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia

Reference24 articles.

1. Fagundes KVDL, Esteves MR, Ribeiro JHM, Siepierski CT, Silva JV, Mentes MA. Instituições de longa permanência como alternativa no acolhimento das pessoas idosas. Rev Salud Pública [Internet]. 2017 [Accessed in Dec 20, 2019];19(2):210-4. Available in: https://doi. org/10.15446/rsap.v19n2.41541

2. Salcher EBG, Portella MR, Scortegagna HM. Cenários de instituições de longa permanência para idosos: retratos da realidade vivenciada por equipe multiprofissional. Rev Bras Geriatr Gerontol [Internet]. 2015 [Accessed in Apr. 23, 2019];18(2):259-72. Available in: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809- 98232015000200259&lng=en http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809- 9823.2015.14073

3. Santana RF, Delvale R, Souza LMS, Menezes AK, Capeletto CSG, Ferreira TCB, et al. Contenção Mecânica em Instituições de Longa Permanência para Idosos. Rev Enferm UFPE [Internet]. 2018 [Accessed in Dec. 31, 2018];12(12):3394-400. Available in: https://periodicos.ufpe.br/ revistas/revistaenfermagem/article/view/234527/30815 https://doi. org/10.5205/1981-8963-v12i12a234527p3394-3400-2018

4. Oye C, Jacobsen FF, Mekki TE. Do organizational constraints explain the use of restraint? A comparative ethnographic study from three nursing homes in Norway. J Clin Nurs. 2017 [Accessed in Dec. 30, 2019];26(13- 14):1906-16. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13504

5. Menezes AK, Santana RF, Cimador F. Práticas assistenciais restritivas e o paradigma da cultura de não contenção da pessoa idosa. In: Freitas EV, ed. Tratado de geriatria e gerontologia. 4ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2016. p. 6582-627.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3