2022 QATAR FIFA DÜNYA KUPASINDAKİ KOLLEKTİF DAVRANIŞLARIN ANALİZİ
Author:
KARABIYIK Hakan1ORCID, DURMUŞ Tugay2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SPOR BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ 2. ANKARA UNIVERSITY
Abstract
Performance analysis is integral to modern football, providing data-driven insights for enhancing strategies, player development, and tactical behaviour. Collective behaviours in football, akin to natural systems, have gained attention. Team coordination, passing networks, and player movement dynamics are critical for analysing performance and team cohesion. Factors such as team length and width contribute to understanding collective behaviour. This study explores factors influencing teams' performance in the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022, including ball possession, field zones, team width, team length, distance to the goal line, and area covered by the team. This study examined 64 matches played among the 32 teams. Analysis reveals the significance of goal-scoring ability, highlighting that winning teams score significantly more goals than draws and losses. Contrary to common belief, ball possession percentages do not significantly differ among these outcomes, indicating its nuanced role. Within possession and out-of-possession phases, strategies like line height, team length, and team depth vary little across different outcomes, suggesting the effectiveness of balanced approaches. In the final third phase, winning teams employ higher defensive lines and deeper formations. In conclusion, this study illuminates the multifaceted nature of football performance. Goal-scoring ability and field zone-specific strategies play pivotal roles. Ball possession's influence is more complex than previously thought. Understanding these dynamics can inform teams and coaches for more informed and effective performance optimization, emphasizing the need for nuanced analysis and future research.
Reference19 articles.
1. Bode, N. W., Faria, J. J., Franks, D. W., Krause, J., & Wood, A. J. (2010). How perceived threat increases synchronization in collectively moving animal groups. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1697), 3065-3070. 2. Carling, C. (2013). Interpreting physical performance in professional soccer match-play: should we be more pragmatic in our approach? Sports medicine, 43, 655-663. 3. Casal, C. A., Anguera, M. T., Maneiro, R., & Losada, J. L. (2019). Possession in football: more than a quantitative aspect–a mixed method study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 501. 4. Casal, C. A., Maneiro, R., Ardá, T., Marí, F. J., & Losada, J. L. (2017). Possession zone as a performance indicator in football. The game of the best teams. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1176.
Casal Sanjurjo, C. A., Andujar, M. Á., Ardá Suárez, A., Maneiro, R., Rial Boubeta, A., & Losada López, J. L. (2021). Multivariate analysis of defensive phase in football: Identification of successful behavior patterns of 2014 Brazil FIFA World Cup. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 16(3), 503-516. 5. Castellano, J., Fernández, E., & Echeazarra, I. (2017). Influence of pitch length on inter-and intra-team behaviors in youth soccer. anales de psicología, 33(3), 486-496.
Clemente, M. F., Couceiro, S. M., Martins, F. M., Mendes, R., & Figueiredo, A. J. (2013). Measuring Collective Behaviour in Football Teams: Inspecting the impact of each half of the match on ball possession. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 13(3), 678-689.
Collet, C. (2013). The possession game? A comparative analysis of ball retention and team success in European and international football, 2007–2010. Journal of sports sciences, 31(2), 123-136.
Deneubourg, J.-L., & Goss, S. (1989). Collective patterns and decision-making. Ethology Ecology & Evolution, 1(4), 295-311.
|
|