Affiliation:
1. Tilburg University
2. Fontys University of Applied Sciences
Abstract
Our aim was to examine the co-design process of two educational programs based on scientific research, to investigate which factors influenced the co-design processes and which lessons we learned. Participatory qualitative research on multiple cases was conducted with representatives of the university, healthcare education (university of applied science), secondary vocational education and training and nursing home care practice. Data were analyzed using a critical creative hermeneutic analysis. Three themes influenced the co-design processes: (1) facilitation of the processes, (2) team members’ attributes and (3) diverse interests and structures. Participants’ diversity slowed down and deepened the collaboration. The positive climate and personal attributes enabled the processes. The complexity of the co-design processes, conflicting interests and making use of the full potential of the diversity were challenging aspects. These challenges can be overcome by organizing and facilitating co-design processes skillfully.
Publisher
University of Cincinnati - Office of Innovation and Community Engagement
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference46 articles.
1. Participatory Research for Health and Social Well-Being;Tineke Abma,2019
2. Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects;Sanne F. Akkerman;Review of Educational Research,2011
3. Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion;J. Bergold;Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung,2012
4. Support, commitment, and employee outcomes in a team environment;James W. Bishop;Journal of Management,2000
5. Creating the conditions for growth: A collaborative practice development programme for clinical nurse leaders;C. Boomer;Journal of Nursing Management,2010
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献