Author:
Jamil Achmad,Briandana Rizki,Marta Rustono Farady
Abstract
This study aims to provide a framing perspective on the study of development communication. This study explains the causes of the emergence of social movements in Indonesia in rejecting the Omnibus Law. The protests against the Omnibus Law that occurred in various cities in Indonesia as a form of resistance to government policies were examined from the perspective of framing theory. The method used is text analysis with Robert N Entman’s framing framework. The unit of analysis is the Omnibus Law protest news published in Tempo Magazine in October 2020. The results of this study indicate that social movements to reject the Omnibus Law were carried out by various elements of society, ranging from workers, students, and other elements of society. Even though the Omnibus Law was finally signed by President Joko Widodo on October 5, 2020, the protest effort remained an important note that this law has many loopholes that are considered to be detrimental to elements of society, potentially damaging the environment, and weakening government authority area.
Publisher
Department of Communication and Community Development Sciences
Subject
Education,Cultural Studies
Reference33 articles.
1. Ahmad, N., & Popa, I.-L. (2014). The Social Media Usage and the Transformation of Political Marketing and Campaigning of the Emerging Democracy in Indonesia. In Social media in politics (pp. 97–125). Springer.
2. Amanah, S., (2010). Peran Komunikasi Pembangunan dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Pesisir. Jurnal Komunikasi Pembangunan, 8(1), 1-19.
3. Anggoro, A. D. (2016). Media, Politik dan Kekuasaan (Analisis Framing Model Robert N. Entman tentang Pemberitaan Hasil Pemilihan Presiden, 9 Juli 2014 di TV One dan Metro TV). ARISTO, 2(2), 25–52.
4. Briandana, R. (2019). Television and National Identity: An Ethnography of Television Audience in the Border of Indonesia-Malaysia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 23(1), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.22146/ jsp.27205
5. Edelman, M. (1993). Contestable Categories and Public Opinion. Political Communication, 10(3), 231–242.