Energy use pattern in rose onion (<i>Allium</i> <i>cepa </i>L.) cultivation
-
Published:2024-06-10
Issue:1
Volume:19
Page:
-
ISSN:2582-4899
-
Container-title:Journal of Horticultural Sciences
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:J. Hortic. Sci.
Author:
Senthil Kumaran G,Carolin Rathinakumari A,Venu S A,Surendra A R
Abstract
A study was conducted to analyse the energy use pattern for cultivation and on farm processing of rose onion (Allium cepa L.). The energy auditing data was collected by stratified random sampling method using a face- to-face interaction at Sadali (Hobli), Sidlaghatta, Chikkaballapur, Karnataka. In this region, the energy utilized for different package of practices followed for rose onion cultivation by conventional practice are land preparation (5-tyne cultivator, 9-tyne cultivator and rotovator), sowing (broadcasting), thinning (manual), manure & fertilizer application (manual), plant protection {weeding (manual and chemical spray), chemical spraying (battery operated sprayer)}, irrigation (micro-irrigation), harvesting (manual) and detopping (manual). The energy use pattern for the above-mentioned various package of practices were found to be 4,207.95±37.21, 664.66±17.68, 53.31±2.68, 22,522.92±385.07, 2,534.40±155.55, 14,980.51±229.49, 807.74±20.80 and 1,571.75±42.77 MJ ha-1, respectively. The input energy, output energy and energy ratio were calculated as 47,343.23±484.65, 38,131.12±462.48 MJ ha-1 and 0.81±0.01, respectively. The energy intensive operation identified was manure and fertilizer application (fertilizer 46.80%; men 0.77%) both indirect and direct energy sources, followed by irrigation (electricity 31.09%; men 0.55%), land preparation (diesel 8.33%) and pesticide application (pesticide 4.53%). It is concluded that the fertilizer, electricity and diesel utilised in rose onion cultivation needs to be optimally minimised through management practices.
Publisher
Society for Promotion of Horticulture
Reference16 articles.
1. Chaudhary, V. P., Gangwar, B., & Pandey, D. K. (2014). Energy budgeting of sustainable rice-based cropping systems in sub-tropical India. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America, 45(4), 58-68. 2. Esengun, K., Erdal, G., Gunduz, O., & Erdal, H. (2007). An economic analysis and energy use in stake-tomato production in Tokat province of Turkey. Renewable Energy, 32, 1873-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2006.07.005 3. Hartirli, S. A., Ozkan, B., & Fert, C. (2006). Energy inputs and crop yield relationship in greenhouse tomato production. Renewable Energy, 31, 427-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2005.04.007 4. Karale, D. S., Khambalkar, V. P., Bhende, S. M., Sharddha, B. A., & Wankhede, P. S. (2008). Energy economic of small farming crop production operations, World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 4(4), 476-482. 5. Kitani, O., (1999). CIGR Handbook of Agricultural Engineering. Volume 5. Energy and Biomass Engineering. Vol (5), p.1-1. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA. https://doi.org/
|
|