Affiliation:
1. Sociology, University of South Florida, Tampa, United States
Abstract
With the rise in globalization, there has been an increase in migration, specifically labor migration. Women migrating to perform care labor has exploded after women formally entered the global labor market. Although many female migrants are independently traveling as the primary breadwinners of their households, they remain underappreciated, invisible, under-waged, and exploited. Upon relocating from countries in the global south to conduct care work in more affluent nations or communities, they leave their dependents behind, ultimately in the care of another female, typically a family member, or yet another more impoverished woman. At this point, the global care chain is not a single, linear chain but rather an intersecting one composed of numerous chains that multiple women become a part of. Therefore these intersections between the public and private, the paid and unpaid, and the productive and reproductive forms of care work are present. In addition, although globalization and neoliberal policy have benefited <i>some</i> women globally, it has dramatically made women who migrate for global care work and labor suffer. When women migrate, the global care chain often becomes an entire phenomenon through which many things intersect. On the one hand, we witness capitalism, feminization of migration, globalization, and neoliberalism interacting while also intersecting with care, emotional work, and gender relations. The goal of this paper is to examine and connect the intersectional effects on women by examining global care work in Asia and Latin America. In addition, we ask the following questions: How can we create change so that women's work is no longer invisible? How can we build a society where individuals are esteemed not just on monetized work but also on reproductive work? Will reproductive labor ever be considered labor? And finally, we will propose some preliminary solutions to begin framing steps forward.
Reference24 articles.
1. Barber, K. (2016). Styling masculinity: Gender, class, and inequality in the men's grooming industry. Retrieved November 21, 2022, from https://www.amazon.com/Styling-Masculinity-Inequality-Grooming-Industry/dp/0813565529
2. Birdsall, N. (2006, January 01). Rising inequality in the new global economy. Retrieved November 21, 2022, from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/eb045856/full/html
3. Brown, R. H. (2015, March 19). Re-examining the Transnational Nanny. Retrieved November 16, 2022, from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14616742.2015.1007728
4. Butler, J. (2019). What threat? the campaign against "Gender ideology". Retrieved November 21, 2022, from https://glocalismjournal.org/what-threat-the-campaign-against-gender-ideology/
5. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. New York, London: Routledge.