A Sentiment Analysis of News Articles Published Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the connotative language used in news articles, leveraging sentiment analysis to gauge shifts in societal attitudes and potential implications for mental health. Utilizing the statistical programming language R, we extracted and analyzed texts from 645 articles published before and during the pandemic by nine authors across three major U.S. newspapers: The Wall Street Journal, New York Times, and The Washington Post. Employing the AFINN and NRC sentiment lexicons, we observed a statistically significant decrease in sentiment during the pandemic period (p < 0.0001), suggesting a pervasive shift in media discourse. This decline, consistent across newspapers and journalists, highlights the profound impact of the pandemic on societal attitudes, reflecting the pain and stress experienced by many. Such a decline in sentiment can create a negative feedback loop that exacerbates the already significant health and behavioral challenges triggered by the pandemic and its associated mitigation measures. Our findings underscore the value of sentiment analysis and text mining in assessing the effects of high-stress, long-term events on global public health while identifying a gap in the existing literature that prioritizes disease-focused research over holistic well-being. This study highlights the critical role of journalists and leaders in shaping public sentiment during crises, advocating for early recognition of concerning trends. It also offers a valuable framework for future research connecting major events with the overall media sentiment and their subsequent effects on public health.