Anti-Poaching for Endangered Megafauna Conservation in Assam, India: Examining Stakeholder Perception

Author:

Balajapalli Sudha1,Kim Younsung1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, United States

Abstract

India is the stronghold for endangered species and poaching and illegal trade have seriously threatened wildlife conservation. Against this backdrop, Indian regulatory authorities have strengthened workforce capacity for monitoring and enforcement actions against poaching, employed patrolling systems, and adopted lethal deterrence-based policies. However, efforts to control poaching and conserve biodiversity are often at odds with local communities' needs and interests, and stakeholder participation in management is integral to successful wildlife conservation. This research aims to understand stakeholder perception of anti-poaching management practices and tribal customs in protected areas. A survey was conducted to gather information from forest staff and fringe villagers at the four national parks and one wildlife sanctuary in Assam, India. The results indicate that villagers around protected areas generally perceive that the Forest Department and patrolling effectively prevent poaching. However, stakeholders' perceptions of the lethal deterrence-based policies and tribal customs were split, depending on the local communities' unique social, economic, and political situations. Leveraging these responses, wildlife managers in India can collaborate with villagers around the protected areas to address the threats of poaching to wild megafauna. Further, this research underpins the reason to strengthen the enforcement capacity of forest staff, as they stand at the frontline of endangered species protection in biodiversity-rich, developing countries.

Publisher

Science Publishing Group

Reference58 articles.

1. Altman, J., & Cochrane, M. (2005). Sustainable development in the indigenous-owned savanna: Innovative institutional design for cooperative wildlife management. Wildlife Research, 32(5), 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR04074

2. Annecke, W., & Masubelele, M. (2016). A review of the impact of militarisation: The case of rhino poaching in Kruger National Park, South Africa. Conservation and Society, 14(3), 195–204.

3. Assam Project on Forest and Biodiversity Conservation. (2018). Evaluation of Assam Project on Forest and Biodiversity Conservation (APFBC) followed by Drafting of Phase II of the Project. http://www.Evaluation-Report-APFBC%20Nov%202018.pdf

4. Assam State Biodiversity Board. (2022). Assam State Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2017-2030. Assam State Biodiversity Board. https://www.asbb.gov.in/booklets/ASBSAP%20Report%20(2).pdf

5. Dang Vu, H. N., & Nielsen, M. R. (2018). Understanding utilitarian and hedonic values determining the demand for rhino horn in Vietnam. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 23(5), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2018.1449038

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3