Affiliation:
1. Department of Environmental Science and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, United States
Abstract
India is the stronghold for endangered species and poaching and illegal trade have seriously threatened wildlife conservation. Against this backdrop, Indian regulatory authorities have strengthened workforce capacity for monitoring and enforcement actions against poaching, employed patrolling systems, and adopted lethal deterrence-based policies. However, efforts to control poaching and conserve biodiversity are often at odds with local communities' needs and interests, and stakeholder participation in management is integral to successful wildlife conservation. This research aims to understand stakeholder perception of anti-poaching management practices and tribal customs in protected areas. A survey was conducted to gather information from forest staff and fringe villagers at the four national parks and one wildlife sanctuary in Assam, India. The results indicate that villagers around protected areas generally perceive that the Forest Department and patrolling effectively prevent poaching. However, stakeholders' perceptions of the lethal deterrence-based policies and tribal customs were split, depending on the local communities' unique social, economic, and political situations. Leveraging these responses, wildlife managers in India can collaborate with villagers around the protected areas to address the threats of poaching to wild megafauna. Further, this research underpins the reason to strengthen the enforcement capacity of forest staff, as they stand at the frontline of endangered species protection in biodiversity-rich, developing countries.
Reference58 articles.
1. Altman, J., & Cochrane, M. (2005). Sustainable development in the indigenous-owned savanna: Innovative institutional design for cooperative wildlife management. Wildlife Research, 32(5), 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR04074
2. Annecke, W., & Masubelele, M. (2016). A review of the impact of militarisation: The case of rhino poaching in Kruger National Park, South Africa. Conservation and Society, 14(3), 195–204.
3. Assam Project on Forest and Biodiversity Conservation. (2018). Evaluation of Assam Project on Forest and Biodiversity Conservation (APFBC) followed by Drafting of Phase II of the Project. http://www.Evaluation-Report-APFBC%20Nov%202018.pdf
4. Assam State Biodiversity Board. (2022). Assam State Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2017-2030. Assam State Biodiversity Board. https://www.asbb.gov.in/booklets/ASBSAP%20Report%20(2).pdf
5. Dang Vu, H. N., & Nielsen, M. R. (2018). Understanding utilitarian and hedonic values determining the demand for rhino horn in Vietnam. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 23(5), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2018.1449038