No Optimal Weight to Survive the Winter in a Northern Island Population of Water Voles <i>Arvicola amphibius</i>

Author:

Frafjord Karl1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The Arctic Museum of Norway, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway

Abstract

Growth and body size of mammals are commonly correlated with many life history strategies, including those related to survival and reproduction. However, in certain circumstances suboptimal growth rates and smaller size may be advantageous and adaptive. The water vole <i>Arvicola amphibius</i> is a large vole, about three times the size of a field vole <i>Microtus agrestis</i>, but with similar ecological and reproductive characteristics. Island populations were studied on the coast of northern Norway, just below the Arctic Circle, during 2003-2018, by capture-mark-recapture. The main aims were to study growth rates, asymptotic weight and survival, expecting that the “optimal” weight for surviving the winter would be 140-160 g. The smallest juveniles caught weighed only 21 g and were assumed, based on data from the literature, to be around 14 days old. This age was used as starting point for the growth curve. This, however, may have been about one week too early, as juveniles are more likely not fully weaned and leave their nest of birth until 30-40 g. Initial growth rates in juveniles was relatively high but declined from around 100-120 g or 40-50 days old. The asymptotic weight was not clearly defined, but its maximum was around 150-160 g. Most juveniles that survived the winter weighed between 100 and 160 g in their first summer. Large individual variations in growth rates were found. Overwintered subadults in spring weighed about the same as juveniles did in the autumn but grew quickly in April and May to reach adult size. A specific “optimal” weight for juveniles that survived the winter was not found. The range could be given as 100-160 g, too broad to define an “optimal” weight range. However, those that survived tended to be slightly heavier than those that died. Reproducing adults generally weighed 180-220 g and did not reduce their weight toward the autumn, i.e., to increase winter survival, but very few adults survived even the summer and almost none survived their second winter. Juveniles postponed reproduction until next spring, most likely to take advantage of fresh vegetation growth and less competition.

Publisher

Science Publishing Group

Reference38 articles.

1. Peters, R. H. The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1986.

2. Case, T. J. Evolution and adaptive significance of postnatal growth rates in terrestrial vertebrates. Q. Rev. Biol. 1978, 53, 243–282.

3. Cuthill, I., Houston. A. Managing time and energy. In Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach, Krebs, J., Davis, N., Eds. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1997, pp. 97–120.

4. Blanckenhorn, W. U. The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms small? Q. Rev. Biol. 2000, 75, 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1086/393620

5. Iverson, S. L, Turner B. N. Winter weight dynamics in Microtus pennsylvanicus. Ecology. 1974, 55, 1030–1041.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3