Performance Evaluation and Adaptability Study of Fodder Beet (<i>Beta vulgaris L</i>.) Cultivars in Highlands of Bale Zone South East Ethiopia
-
Published:2024-04-17
Issue:2
Volume:12
Page:32-39
-
ISSN:2328-5893
-
Container-title:American Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BIO
Author:
Tesfaye Wubshet1, Lencho Gemechis1, Wegi Teklu1, Kedu Aliyi1
Affiliation:
1. Animal Feed Resource and Rangeland Improvement, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Sinana Agricultural Research Center, Bale Robe, Ethiopia
Abstract
Shortage animal feed interims of quality and quantity is the major bottle neck in livestock production through the year in Ethiopia particularly in the highlands of Bale Zone. A study was conducted at Sinana Agricultural Research Center (SARC), South East Ethiopia for three consecutive cropping season (2020/21, 2021/22 and 2022/23) in two locations (Sinana on station and Agarfa subsite) to evaluate the adaptability of four Cultivars of Fodder beet (namely Bircks, Kulumsa, Magnum and Robbos). Experimental plots were laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. All cultivars were performed well. However, there is significant variation among the Cultivars. The combined result over locations over years indicated that, Kulumsa cultivars gives the highest shoot fresh biomass yield (41.88 t ha<sup>-1</sup>), root fresh biomass yield (86.49 t ha<sup>-1</sup>) and shoot Dry biomass yield (4.52 t ha<sup>-1</sup>). The remaining cultivars have not statistically significant different. Based on the results of this study, it is concluded that the Fodder beet Kulumsa cultivars was found a promising in terms of grain and biomass yield, than others that could be demonstrated and popularized as an alternative feed resources under smallholder conditions in the study areas and with similar climatic and edaphic conditions.
Publisher
Science Publishing Group
Reference16 articles.
1. Abdallah, E. F. and Yassen, A. A. (2008). Fodder beet productivity under fertilization treatments and water augmentation. Australian journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 2(2): 282-287. 2. Al-Jbawi, E., 2020. All about fodder beet (beta vulgaris subsp. crassa L.) as a source of forage in the world and Syria. Research Journal of Science–RJS1, pp. 24-44. 3. AL-Jbawi, E. M., Bagdadi, M. and Nemr, Y., 2014. The effect of plant spacing on some quality traits of fodder beet (Beta Vulgaris var. crassa) varieties. International Journal of Environment. 3(3), 286-293. 4. Ayele, S., Assegid, W., Jabbar, M. A., Ahmed, M. M. and Belachew, H., 2002. Livestock marketing in Ethiopia. A review of structure, performance and development initiatives. Socio-economics and Policy Research Working Paper 52. ILRI, Nairobi, Kenya. 5. Chakwizira, E., Teixeira, E., Meenken, E., Michel, A. J. and Maley, S., 2018. Radiation use efficiency and biomass partitioning to storage roots in fodder beet crops. European Journal of Agronomy, 92, pp. 63-71.
|
|