Affiliation:
1. Food Science Research Directorate, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Abstract
Maize is widely produced in Ethiopia and is mostly used for human consumption. Considerable efforts are being made by agricultural researchers to release different maize varieties and adaptations according to different agro-ecology. However, there is an information gap on the physic-chemicals of food qualities and the consumer's preference for all maize varieties. Thus, this study was conducted to evaluate the food quality of released food maize varieties through physical, chemical and sensory evaluation. Fifteen released maize varieties were collected from different agricultural research centers. The physicochemical attributes of these varieties were analyzed with three replications. Sensory evaluation was also performed by using the hedonic scale method. Thousand kernel weight, moisture, oil, protein, starch, ash, sodium, calcium potassium, and phosphorus contents were determined in the range of 152.81 – 479.45 grams, 9.54 – 12.97%, 3.78 – 4.86%, 7.07 – 11.76%, 77.75 – 81.27%, 0.64 – 1.12%, 228.75 – 3.02.33 ppm, 225.65 – 332.34 ppm, 1626.34 – 2714.51 ppm and 956.95 – 1452.86 ppm, 305.42 – 716.91 ppm and 811.50 – 1731.10 ppm, respectively. Overall acceptability of porridge and Injera prepared from maize varieties were on the scale of neither like nor dislike to like moderately. There were significant (P<0.05) variations in physical, chemical and organoleptic properties due to maize varieties variation. BH540, BH661 and Limu maize varieties had higher starch content and white color that gave them better acceptance value than those varieties with higher protein content and yellow color such as Melkasa 1, Melkasa seven, and Melkasa IQ maize varieties.
Reference17 articles.
1. Chamberlin J, Schmidt E., 2012. Ethiopian agriculture: A dynamic geographic perspective. Food and Agriculture in Ethiopia: Progress and policy challenges 74: 21.
2. The federal democratic republic of Ethiopia. Central statistical agency agricultural sample survey 2017/18 volume I report on area and production of major crops. https://www.statsethiopia.gov.et/wp-content/uploads/2020/02
3. James Warner Tim Stehulak, Leulsegged Kasa, 2015. Woreda-Level Crop Production Rankings in Ethiopia: A Pooled Data Approach. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. https://www.ifpri.org/publication/woreda-level-crop-production-rankings-ethiopia-pooled-data-approach
4. Tsedeke A., Bekele S., Abebe M., 2015. Factors that transformed maize productivity in Ethiopia. Food Sec. (2015) 7: 965–981 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0488-z
5. Berhane, G., Paulos, Z., Tafere, K., & Tamru, S. (2011). Food grain consumption and calorie intake patterns in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa: IFPRI.