Affiliation:
1. Department of Accounting & Finance, Kisii University, Kisii, Kenya
Abstract
The increased volatility and decline in firm value has been observed for companies listed in the Nairobi Securities exchange, Kenya as evidenced by substantial variations between market-to-book values. Company disclosures in integrated reports have long been linked with firm value. However, integration of non-financial information disclosures with financial information in a single report and its worth to the company and its distinctive stakeholders has not been accorded a proper assessment in the African context. While, preceding studies in other settings have shown mixed results, emphasis has been on establishing the total effects. This comparative study was intended to determine the effect of <IR> capitals disclosure on value of listed companies in Kenya and South Africa, focusing on the role of the business model. Specifically, the role of the business model on the relationship between social and relationship capital disclosure and value of listed companies was examined in this research comparing Kenya and south Africa from 2018 to 2020. Positivist research philosophy was applied, while the research design encompassed both exploratory and confirmatory. The study was grounded on the Legitimacy theory. Firm value in this study was proxied by Tobin’s Q ratio, while, social and relationship capital was measured using an unweighted disclosure index. The study population contained 209 listed companies from which a sample of 137 was identified using purposeful sampling technique, comprising of 19 firms listed in the NSE, Kenya and 118 companies listed in the JSE, South Africa. Secondary data was collected from annual integrated reports and financial statements of the targeted firms. Preliminary analyses were conducted, such as descriptive statistics and correlation matrix. On the other hand, mediation effect was analysed by using stepwise regression method. The results depict that social and relationship capital disclosure has a statistically significant positive effect on firm values for both Kenya and South Africa. Further, business model mediates this relationship, with Kenyan listed firms manifesting inconsistent mediation while South African companies reported full/complete mediation. The study therefore recommends that social and relationship capital aspect of integrated reporting in Kenya should be made mandatory because this will improve shareholder understanding of financial statements and appropriate valuation of the firm.
Reference48 articles.
1. Anuonye, N. B. (2016). Effect of intellectual capital on return on assets of insurance firms in Nigeria. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 16(1), 41-52.
2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
3. Beck, C., Dumay, J. & Frost, G. (2017). In pursuit of a single source of truth: From threatened legitimacy to integrated reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(1), 191-205. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10551-014-2423-1
4. Bucaro, A., Jackson, K., & Lill, J., B.(2018). The influence of corporate social responsibility measures on investors’ judgments when integrated in a financial report versus presented in a separate report: http://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12542
5. Bhuyan, M., Lodh, S. C. & Perera, N. (2017). The effects of corporate social disclosure on firm performance: Empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand Conference, 1-36. https://ro.uow.edu.au/buspapers/1218