Affiliation:
1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
Abstract
This study focused on a comparative analysis of developed Non-stationary rainfall intensity-duration-frequency (NS-IDF) models with existing IDF models for the Niger Delta with Uyo, Benin, Port Harcourt, and Warri as selected stations. Applied was 24-hourly (daily) annual maximum series (AMS) data with downscaling models also used to downscale the time series data. Uyo and Benin had statistically significant trends with Port Harcourt and Warri showing mild trends. The best linear behavioural parameter extremes model integrating time as co-variate was selected for each station for computation of the General extreme value (GEV) distribution fitted NS-IDF models with the open-access R-studio software. The Non-stationary intensity values were higher than computed stationary ones, with significant differences at a 5% significance level for a given return period. For example, for 2 and 10-year return periods for 1-hour storms the differences of 22.71% & 17.0%, 15.24% & 9.40%, 5.09% & 4.04%, and 6.15% & 4.43% for Uyo, Benin, Port Harcourt and Warri, respectively were recorded. While, the percentage difference in intensities was very high between the Non-stationary and existing, Stationary IDF models. For a return period of 2 years at 15 and 60 min durations, the differences were 97.9 & 3.2%, 240.6 & 67.2%, 78.2 & 0%, and 121.6 & 50.1% for Uyo, Benin, Port Harcourt and Warri, respectively. Such extreme value difference in intensity underestimates the peak flood and exagerate the flood risk. The general NS-IDF calibrated models showed very good match and fit with R<sup>2</sup> = 0.977, 0.999, 0.999 & 0.999, and MSE accuracy = 193.5, 1.011, 4.1552 & 1.011 for Uyo, Benin, Port Harcourt, and Warri, respectively. Erosion and flood control facilities in the Niger Delta require upgrading using the calibrated general NS-IDF models to accommodate extra-value rainfall intensities due to climate change.
Reference22 articles.
1. Ouarda, T. B. M. J., Yousef, L. A. and Charron, C. (2019) Non-stationary Intensity-Duration- Frequency Curves Integrating Information Concerning Tele-connections and Climatology https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5953
2. Adamowski, K. and Bougadis, J. (2006) Detection of Trends in Annual Extreme Rainfall. Hydrological Processes, 17: 3547-3560. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1353
3. Cheng, L. and AghaKouchak, A. (2014) Non-Stationarity Precipitation Intensity- Duration-Frequency Curves for Infrastructure Design in a Changing Climate. Science Reports, 4, Article No. 7093, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07093
4. Ganguli, P. and Coulibaly, P. (2017) Does Non-Stationary in Rainfall Require Non- Stationary Intensity-Duration Frequency Curves? Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21, 6461-6483. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6461-2017
5. Aghakouchak, A., Ragno, E., Love, C. and Moftakhari, H. (2018) Projected Changes in California’s Precipitation Intensity-Duration-Frequency Curves. California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment, California Energy Commission. Pub. No.: CCCA4-CEC- 2018-005. https://www.energy.ca.gov-CCCA4-CEC-2018-005