Development and validation of risk stratification models for adult spinal deformity surgery

Author:

Pellisé Ferran1,Serra-Burriel Miquel2,Smith Justin S.3,Haddad Sleiman1,Kelly Michael P.4,Vila-Casademunt Alba5,Sánchez Pérez-Grueso Francisco Javier6,Bess Shay7,Gum Jeffrey L.8,Burton Douglas C.9,Acaroğlu Emre10,Kleinstück Frank11,Lafage Virginie12,Obeid Ibrahim13,Schwab Frank12,Shaffrey Christopher I.3,Alanay Ahmet14,Ames Christopher15,_ _,_ _

Affiliation:

1. Spine Surgery Unit, Vall d’Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain;

2. Center for Research in Health and Economics, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain;

3. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia;

4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri;

5. Spine Research Unit, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain;

6. Spine Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain;

7. Denver International Spine Center, Presbyterian St. Luke’s/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, Colorado;

8. Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky;

9. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas;

10. Ankara ARTES Spine Center, Ankara, Turkey;

11. Spine Center Division, Department of Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, Schulthess Klinik, Zürich, Switzerland;

12. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York;

13. Spine Surgery Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France;

14. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Acıbadem University, Istanbul, Turkey; and

15. Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, California

Abstract

OBJECTIVEAdult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery has a high rate of major complications (MCs). Public information about adverse outcomes is currently limited to registry average estimates. The object of this study was to assess the incidence of adverse events after ASD surgery, and to develop and validate a prognostic tool for the time-to-event risk of MC, hospital readmission (RA), and unplanned reoperation (RO).METHODSTwo models per outcome, created with a random survival forest algorithm, were trained in an 80% random split and tested in the remaining 20%. Two independent prospective multicenter ASD databases, originating from the European continent and the United States, were queried, merged, and analyzed. ASD patients surgically treated by 57 surgeons at 23 sites in 5 countries in the period from 2008 to 2016 were included in the analysis.RESULTSThe final sample consisted of 1612 ASD patients: mean (standard deviation) age 56.7 (17.4) years, 76.6% women, 10.4 (4.3) fused vertebral levels, 55.1% of patients with pelvic fixation, 2047.9 observation-years. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed that 12.1% of patients had at least one MC at 10 days after surgery; 21.5%, at 90 days; and 36%, at 2 years. Discrimination, measured as the concordance statistic, was up to 71.7% (95% CI 68%–75%) in the development sample for the postoperative complications model. Surgical invasiveness, age, magnitude of deformity, and frailty were the strongest predictors of MCs. Individual cumulative risk estimates at 2 years ranged from 3.9% to 74.1% for MCs, from 3.17% to 44.2% for RAs, and from 2.67% to 51.9% for ROs.CONCLUSIONSThe creation of accurate prognostic models for the occurrence and timing of MCs, RAs, and ROs following ASD surgery is possible. The presented variability in patient risk profiles alongside the discrimination and calibration of the models highlights the potential benefits of obtaining time-to-event risk estimates for patients and clinicians.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference43 articles.

1. Refinement of the SRS-22 Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire Function domain;Asher;Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2006

2. Does treatment (nonoperative and operative) improve the two-year quality of life in patients with adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis: a prospective multicenter evidence-based medicine study;Bridwell;Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2009

3. The Oswestry Disability Index;Fairbank;Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2000

4. Thirty-day readmissions after elective spine surgery for degenerative conditions among US Medicare beneficiaries;Wang;Spine J,2012

5. Response to: “MySurgeryRisk: Development and Validation of a Machine-learning Risk Algorithm for Major Complications and Death After Surgery”;Bihorac;Ann Surg

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3