Are we improving in the optimization of surgery for high-risk adult cervical spine deformity patients over time?

Author:

Passias Peter G.12,Tretiakov Peter S.12,Smith Justin S.3,Lafage Renaud4,Diebo Bassel5,Scheer Justin K.6,Eastlack Robert K.7,Daniels Alan H.5,Klineberg Eric O.8,Khabeish Khaled M.9,Mundis Gregory M.7,Turner Jay D.10,Gupta Munish C.11,Kim Han Jo12,Schwab Frank4,Bess Shay13,Lafage Virginie4,Ames Christopher P.6,Shaffrey Christopher I.14

Affiliation:

1. Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, Division of Spine Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York;

2. New York Spine Institute, New York, New York;

3. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia;

4. Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York;

5. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island;

6. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California;

7. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California;

8. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, California;

9. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland;

10. Department of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona;

11. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri;

12. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York;

13. Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Center, Presbyterian St. Luke’s/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, Colorado; and

14. Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate whether surgery for high-risk patients is being optimized over time and if poor outcomes are being minimized. METHODS Patients who underwent surgery for cervical deformity (CD) and were ≥ 18 years with baseline and 2-year data were stratified by year of surgery from 2013 to 2018. The cohort was divided into two groups based on when the surgery was performed. Patients in the early cohort underwent surgery between 2013 and 2015 and those in the recent cohort underwent surgery between 2016 and 2018. High-risk patients met at least 2 of the following criteria: 1) baseline C2–7 Cobb angle > 15°, mismatch between T1 slope and cervical lordosis ≥ 35°, C2–7 sagittal vertical axis > 4 cm, or chin-brow vertical angle > 25°; 2) age ≥ 70 years; 3) severe baseline frailty (Miller index); 4) Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 1 SD above the mean; 5) three-column osteotomy as treatment; and 6) fusion > 10 levels or > 7 levels for elderly patients. The mean comparison analysis assessed differences between groups. Stepwise multivariable linear regression described associations between increasing year of surgery and complications. RESULTS Eighty-two CD patients met high-risk criteria (mean age 62.11 ± 10.87 years, 63.7% female, mean BMI 29.70 ± 8.16 kg/m2, and mean CCI 1.07 ± 1.45). The proportion of high-risk patients increased with time, with 41.8% of patients in the early cohort classified as high risk compared with 47.6% of patients in the recent cohort (p > 0.05). Recent high-risk patients were more likely to be female (p = 0.008), have a lower BMI (p = 0.038), and have a higher baseline CCI (p = 0.013). Surgically, high-risk patients in the recent cohort were more likely to undergo low-grade osteotomy (p = 0.003). By postoperative complications, recent high-risk patients were less likely to experience any postoperative adverse events overall (p = 0.020) or complications such as dysphagia (p = 0.045) at 2 years. Regression analysis revealed increasing year of surgery to be correlated with decreasing minor complication rates (p = 0.030), as well as lowered rates of distal junctional kyphosis by 2 years (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS Over time, high-risk CD patients have an increase in frequency and comorbidity rates but have demonstrated improved postoperative outcomes. These findings suggest that spine surgeons have improved over time in optimizing selection and reducing potential adverse events in high-risk patients.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference26 articles.

1. Association of spinal alignment correction with patient-reported outcomes in adult cervical deformity: review of the literature;Massaad E,2021

2. Highest achievable outcomes for patients undergoing cervical deformity corrective surgery by frailty;Passias PG,2022

3. Predicting the combined occurrence of poor clinical and radiographic outcomes following cervical deformity corrective surgery;Horn SR,2019

4. Predictive model for achieving good clinical and radiographic outcomes at one-year following surgical correction of adult cervical deformity;Passias PG,2021

5. Complications and outcomes for surgical approaches to cervical kyphosis;Grosso MJ,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3