Consensus-based perioperative protocols during the COVID-19 pandemic

Author:

Mummaneni Praveen V.1,Burke John F.1,Chan Andrew K.1,Sosa Julie Ann2,Lobo Errol P.3,Mummaneni Valli P.3,Antrum Sheila4,Berven Sigurd H.5,Conte Michael S.26,Doernberg Sarah B.78,Goldberg Andrew N.9,Hess Christopher P.10,Hetts Steven W.1011,Josephson S. Andrew12,Kohi Maureen P.1013,Ma C. Benjamin5,Mahadevan Vaikom S.148,Molinaro Annette M.1,Murr Andrew H.9,Narayana Sirisha8,Roberts John P.2,Stoller Marshall L.15,Theodosopoulos Philip V.1,Vail Thomas P.5,Wienholz Sandra16,Gropper Michael A.3,Green Adrienne8,Berger Mitchel S.1

Affiliation:

1. Departments of Neurological Surgery,

2. Surgery,

3. Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine,

4. Chancellor’s Cabinet; and

5. Orthopedic Surgery,

6. Divisions of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery,

7. Infectious Diseases,

8. Medicine, and

9. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery,

10. Radiology and Biomedical Imaging,

11. Interventional Neuroradiology,

12. Neurology,

13. Vascular and Interventional Radiology, and

14. Cardiology;

15. Urology;

16. Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, California

Abstract

OBJECTIVEDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, quaternary-care facilities continue to provide care for patients in need of urgent and emergent invasive procedures. Perioperative protocols are needed to streamline care for these patients notwithstanding capacity and resource constraints.METHODSA multidisciplinary panel was assembled at the University of California, San Francisco, with 26 leaders across 10 academic departments, including 7 department chairpersons, the chief medical officer, the chief operating officer, infection control officers, nursing leaders, and resident house staff champions. An epidemiologist, an ethicist, and a statistician were also consulted. A modified two-round, blinded Delphi method based on 18 agree/disagree statements was used to build consensus. Significant disagreement for each statement was tested using a one-sided exact binomial test against an expected outcome of 95% consensus using a significance threshold of p < 0.05. Final triage protocols were developed with unblinded group-level discussion.RESULTSOverall, 15 of 18 statements achieved consensus in the first round of the Delphi method; the 3 statements with significant disagreement (p < 0.01) were modified and iteratively resubmitted to the expert panel to achieve consensus. Consensus-based protocols were developed using unblinded multidisciplinary panel discussions. The final algorithms 1) quantified outbreak level, 2) triaged patients based on acuity, 3) provided a checklist for urgent/emergent invasive procedures, and 4) created a novel scoring system for the allocation of personal protective equipment. In particular, the authors modified the American College of Surgeons three-tiered triage system to incorporate more urgent cases, as are often encountered in neurosurgery and spine surgery.CONCLUSIONSUrgent and emergent invasive procedures need to be performed during the COVID-19 pandemic. The consensus-based protocols in this study may assist healthcare providers to optimize perioperative care during the pandemic.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3