Digital cognitive testing using a tablet-based app in patients with brain tumors: a single-center feasibility study comparing the app to the gold standard

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Healthcare digitization has led to increasing tablet-based apps to improve diagnostics, self-discipline, and well-being in patients. Moreover, patient-reported outcome measures are crucial for optimized treatment, with superior applicability if independent from patient visits. Whereas most uses cover health maintenance, only a few studies have focused on cognitive testing in neurosurgical patients despite its nature as one of the most integrative outcome measures in neurooncology. METHODS The authors performed a prospective single-center feasibility study including neurosurgical patients affected by intraaxial tumors and healthy subjects, testing cognitive function by using a digitized app-based approach and conventional paper-and-pencil (PP) tests. Healthy subjects underwent follow-up testing for retest reliability. RESULTS The authors included 24 patients with brain tumor and 10 healthy subjects, all of whom completed both tests. Equivalent mean performance results were found in the tablet-based digital app and PP counterparts; whereas the digital approach had shorter test duration in patients (29.9 minutes for PP vs 21.9 minutes for app, p = 0.019) and in the healthy cohort (23.2 minutes for PP vs 16.4 minutes for app, p = 0.003), patients with brain tumor scored lower when both test strategies were applied. Results were consistent in healthy subjects after a median of 3 months. CONCLUSIONS Cognitive function assessment is feasible using a digitized tablet-based app, with equivalent results to those of PP tests in healthy subjects and patients with brain tumor. Thus, this approach allows much closer follow-up independent of patient visits and might provide a viable option to improve patient follow-ups.