Effective accuracy of stereoelectroencephalography: robotic 3D versus Talairach orthogonal approaches

Author:

Bourdillon Pierre1234,Châtillon Claude-Edouard56,Moles Alexis1,Rheims Sylvain278,Catenoix Hélène7,Montavont Alexandra7,Ostrowsky-Coste Karine7,Boulogne Sebastien27,Isnard Jean7,Guénot Marc129

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, Neurology & Neurosurgery Hospital Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France;

2. Faculty of Medicine Claude Bernard, University of Lyon, Lyon, France;

3. Faculty of Science & Engineering, Sorbonne University, Paris, France;

4. Brain and Spine Institute, INSERM U1127, CNRS 7225, Paris, France;

5. Department of Surgery, Service of Neurosurgery, Centre Hospitalier Affilié Universitaire Régional, Trois-Rivières Hospital, Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada;

6. Faculty of Medicine, Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;

7. Department of Functional Neurology and Epileptology, Neurology & Neurosurgery Hospital Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France;

8. TIGER, Neuroscience Research Center of Lyon, INSERM U1028, CNRS 5292, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France; and

9. NEUROPAIN Team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, INSERM U1028, CNRS 5292, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France

Abstract

OBJECTIVEStereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) was first developed in the 1950s by Jean Talairach using 2D angiography and a frame-based, orthogonal approach through a metallic grid. Since then, various other frame-based and frameless techniques have been described. In this study the authors sought to compare the traditional orthogonal Talairach 2D angiographic approach with a frame-based 3D robotic procedure that included 3D angiographic interoperative imaging guidance. MRI was used for both procedures during surgery, but MRI preplanning was done only in the robotic 3D technique.METHODSAll study patients suffered from drug-resistant focal epilepsy and were treated at the same center by the same neurosurgical team. Fifty patients who underwent the 3D robotic procedure were compared to the same number of historical controls who had previously been successfully treated with the Talairach orthogonal procedure. The effectiveness and absolute accuracy, as well as safety, of the two procedures were compared. Moreover, in the 3D robotic group, the reliability of the preoperative MRI to avoid vascular structures was evaluated by studying the rate of trajectory modification following the coregistration of the intraoperative 3D angiographic data onto the preoperative MRI-based trajectory plans.RESULTSEffective accuracy (96.5% vs 13.7%) and absolute accuracy (1.15 mm vs 4.00 mm) were significantly higher in the 3D robotic group than in the Talairach orthogonal group. Both procedures showed excellent safety results (no major complications). The rate of electrode modification after 3D angiography was 43.8%, and it was highest for frontal and insular locations.CONCLUSIONSThe frame-based, 3D angiographic, robotic procedure described here provided better accuracy for SEEG implantations than the traditional Talairach approach. This study also highlights the potential safety advantage of trajectory planning using intraoperative frame-based 3D angiography over preoperative MRI alone.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Subject

Genetics,Animal Science and Zoology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3