Affiliation:
1. Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California;
2. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama; and
3. Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to find areas of agreement among pediatric neurosurgeons with respect to the clinical management of asymptomatic newborns with a variety of lumbosacral skin findings.
METHODS
An electronic survey containing 18 clinical images and brief vignettes was sent to pediatric neurosurgeons within the American Academy of Pediatrics Section of Neurological Surgery (AAP SONS). In total, 38% (n = 21) of AAP SONS members submitted complete responses to the survey. Respondents were asked if they would advise routine care, watchful waiting, imaging, or subspecialty consultation for each clinical case. Responses were categorized into two groups: 1) watchful waiting and/or routine care, or 2) imaging and/or subspecialty consultation. Consensus was categorized as good (> 90% of responses in the same group), modest (70%–90%), and poor (< 70%). Demographic information, local factors impacting management, and experiences with local referral patterns were also collected.
RESULTS
Among the pediatric neurosurgeons within the AAP SONS network, the authors found high levels (> 90%) of agreement that subcutaneous lipomas, faun tail nevi, large skin tags, and deep/atypical lumbosacral dimples in asymptomatic newborns should prompt an imaging study. Similarly, the authors found high agreement that simple coccygeal dimples do not need imaging. The management of some types of lumbosacral vascular marks and gluteal crease deviations had poor agreement (< 70%). When imaging was recommended, there was preference for spinal MRI in most cases (67%).
CONCLUSIONS
Pediatric neurosurgeons generally agree that imaging of the spine is indicated for asymptomatic newborns with subcutaneous lipomas, faun tail nevi, large skin tags, or deep/atypical lumbar dimples (deep or atypical appearing). They also agree that imaging is unnecessary for infants with simple coccygeal dimples. There was a notable lack of consensus on the appropriate management of certain gluteal cleft deviations and cutaneous vascular marks.
Publisher
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
Reference15 articles.
1. Occult spinal dysraphism;Anderson FM,1968
2. Occult spinal dysraphism: a series of 73 cases;Anderson FM,1975
3. A cross-sectional assessment of cutaneous lumbosacral and coccygeal physical examination findings in a healthy newborn population;Aby J,2018
4. Lumbosacral skin markers and identification of occult spinal dysraphism in neonates;Gibson PJ,1995
5. Minor skin lesions as markers of occult spinal dysraphisms—prospective study;Henriques JG,2005