The diagnostic accuracy of MRI and nonenhanced CT for high-risk vertebral artery anatomy for subaxial anterior cervical spine surgery safety

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Medial migration of the vertebral artery (VA) can be a risk factor for injury during anterior procedures. CT angiography (CTA) has been considered the gold standard for the evaluation of various areas of the arterial anatomy. MRI and nonenhanced CT are more commonly used as routine preoperative imaging studies, but it is unclear if these modalities can safely exclude the anomalous course of the VA. The aims of this cross-sectional observational study were to investigate risk factors for medially migrated VA on CTA and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI and nonenhanced CT for high-risk VA anatomy in the subaxial cervical spine. METHODS The records of 248 patients who underwent CTA for any reason at a single academic institution between 2007 and 2018 were reviewed. The authors included MRI and nonenhanced CT taken within 1 year before or after CTA. An axial VA position classification was used to grade VA anomalies in the subaxial cervical spine. The multivariable linear regression analysis with mixed models was performed to identify the risk factors for medialized VA. The sensitivity and specificity of MRI and nonenhanced CT for high-risk VA positions were calculated. RESULTS A total of 175 CTA sequences met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 63.8 years. Advanced age, disc and pedicle levels, lower cervical levels, and left side were independent risk factors for medially migrated VA. The sensitivities of MRI and nonenhanced CT for the detection of grade 1 or higher VA position were only fair, and the sensitivity of MRI was lower than that of nonenhanced CT (0.31 vs 0.37, p < 0.001), but the specificities were similarly high for both modalities (0.97 vs 0.97). With the combination of MRI and nonenhanced CT, the sensitivity significantly increased to 0.50 (p < 0.001 vs MRI and vs CT alone) with a minimal decrease in specificity. CONCLUSIONS Axial images of MRI and nonenhanced CT demonstrated high specificities but only fair sensitivities. Nonenhanced CT demonstrated better diagnostic value than MRI. When combining both modalities the sensitivity improved, but a substantial proportion of medialized VAs could not be diagnosed.