Linear accelerator radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: the relationship of size to outcome

Author:

Friedman William A.,Bova Frank J.,Mendenhall William M.

Abstract

✓ Between May, 1988 and August, 1993, 158 patients with arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) were treated radiosurgically at the University of Florida. A mean dose of 1560 cGy was directed to the periphery of the lesions, which had a mean volume of 9 cc (0.5 to 45.3 cc). One hundred thirty-nine of these individuals were treated with one isocenter. The mean follow-up interval was 33 months with clinical information available on 153 of these patients. Patients were followed until magnetic resonance (MR) studies suggested complete AVM thrombosis. An arteriogram was then performed, if possible, to verify occlusion status. If arteriography revealed any persistent nidus at 36 months posttreatment, the residual nidus was re-treated. Outcome categories of AVMs analyzed included the following possibilities: 1) angiographic cure; 2) angiographic failure; 3) re-treatment; 4) MR image suggested cure; 5) MR image suggested failure; 6) patient refused follow-up evaluation; 7) patient lost to follow-up study; or 8) patient deceased. The endpoints for success or failure of radiosurgery were as follows: angiographic occlusion (success), re-treatment (failure), and death due to AVM hemorrhage (failure). Fifty-six patients in this series reached one of the endpoints. Successful endpoints were seen in 91% of AVMs between 1 and 4 cc in volume, 100% of AVMs 4 to 10 cc in volume, and 79% of AVMs greater than 10 cc in volume. The more traditional measure of radiosurgical success, percentage of angiograms showing complete obliteration, was obtained in 81% of AVMs between 1 and 4 cc in volume, 89% of AVMs between 4 and 10 cc in volume, and 69% of AVMs greater than 10 cc in volume. A detailed analysis of the relationship of all outcome categories to size is presented.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Cited by 281 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3