Evidence of improved surgical outcome following endoscopy for nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma removal

Author:

Messerer Mahmoud1,De battista Juan Carlos1,Raverot Gérald2,Kassis Sebouh1,Dubourg Julie3,Lapras Veronique4,Trouillas Jacqueline5,Perrin Gilles6,Jouanneau Emmanuel

Affiliation:

1. 1Département de Neurochirurgie A, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Hospices Civils de Lyon;

2. 2Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Université de Lyon I, Fédération d'Endocrinologie, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Hospices Civils de Lyon;

3. 3Université de Lyon I, Centre d'Investigation Clinique CIC201, Hôpital Louis Pradel, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Hospices Civils de Lyon;

4. 4Département de Radiologie, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon;

5. 5Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Université de Lyon I, Département d'Histologie et d'Embryologie Moléculaire, Centre de Pathologie Est, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Hospices Civils de Lyon;

6. 6Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Université de Lyon I, Département de Neurochirurgie C, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Hospices Civils de Lyon; and

Abstract

Object Because of their size and lateral extension, total removal of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) remains a challenge and postoperative tumor remnants are frequent. Endoscopy has improved the surgeon's view; however, its superiority in terms of surgical outcome remains undetermined. The authors' aim in this study was to compare the clinical results and morbidity between microscopic and endoscopic techniques in 164 patients with NFPAs. Methods Tumoral (3D MR imaging), endocrinological, and ophthalmological results and morbidity were compared between 2 groups of 82 patients with newly diagnosed NFPAs surgically treated via either a sublabial microscopic approach (Group B) or a fully endonasal endoscopic technique (Group A). Results The groups showed no difference in terms of clinical features, tumor size, or cavernous sinus invasion (p > 0.05). One year postoperatively, the quality of resection was significantly improved in Group A (gross-total removal [GTR]: 74% vs 50% in Group B, p = 0.002) with greater control of lateral extension (Knosp Grade 2: GTR 88.2% vs 47.8% in Group B, p = 0.02; Knosp Grade 3: 67.9% vs 16.7% in Group B, p < 0.001) and suprasellar extension (tumor height 20–30 mm: GTR 76% vs 53% in Group B, p = 0.01). Endocrinological outcome in patients with a partial deficiency in anterior pituitary function preoperatively was significantly better in Group A (improvement 56% vs 25% in Group B, stabilization 22% vs 46%, and aggravation 22% vs 29%; p = 0.01). Among the ophthalmologically symptomatic patients, 100% from Group A improved compared with 93% in Group B (p = 0.35). Lastly, no significant difference was found regarding morbidity. These data were supported by the literature in which the GTR rate is consistently higher for endoscopy compared with microscopy. Conclusions In this large series of patients with NFPAs, endoscopy improved the quality of resection and endocrinological outcome. Larger studies focusing on the impact of these promising results on the long-term recurrence of NFPAs are warranted.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Subject

Neurology (clinical),General Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3