Mobile spine chordoma: results of 166 patients from the AOSpine Knowledge Forum Tumor database

Author:

Gokaslan Ziya L.1,Zadnik Patricia L.1,Sciubba Daniel M.1,Germscheid Niccole2,Goodwin C. Rory1,Wolinsky Jean-Paul1,Bettegowda Chetan1,Groves Mari L.1,Luzzati Alessandro3,Rhines Laurence D.4,Fisher Charles G.5,Varga Peter Pal6,Dekutoski Mark B.7,Clarke Michelle J.8,Fehlings Michael G.9,Quraishi Nasir A.10,Chou Dean11,Reynolds Jeremy J.12,Williams Richard P.13,Kawahara Norio14,Boriani Stefano15

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland;

2. Research Department, AOSpine International, Davos, Switzerland;

3. Section for Oncological Orthopaedics and Reconstruction of the Spine, IRCCS Istituto Orthopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy;

4. Department of Neurosurgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas;

5. Department of Orthopaedics, Division of Spine, University of British Columbia and Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;

6. National Center for Spinal Disorders and Buda Health Center, Budapest, Hungary;

7. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The CORE Institute, Sun City West, Arizona;

8. Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota;

9. Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, University of Toronto and Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;

10. Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom;

11. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, California;

12. Spinal Division, Nuffield Orthopedic Centre, University of Oxford, United Kingdom;

13. Department of Orthopaedics, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia;

14. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan; and

15. Department of Oncologic and Degenerative Spine Surgery, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna, Italy

Abstract

OBJECT A chordoma is an indolent primary spinal tumor that has devastating effects on the patient's life. These lesions are chemoresistant, resistant to conventional radiotherapy, and moderately sensitive to proton therapy; however, en bloc resection remains the preferred treatment for optimizing patient outcomes. While multiple small and largely retrospective studies have investigated the outcomes following en bloc resection of chordomas in the sacrum, there have been few large-scale studies on patients with chordomas of the mobile spine. The goal of this study was to review the outcomes of surgically treated patients with mobile spine chordomas at multiple international centers with respect to local recurrence and survival. This multiinstitutional retrospective study collected data between 1988 and 2012 about prognosis-predicting factors, including various clinical characteristics and surgical techniques for mobile spine chordoma. Tumors were classified according to the Enneking principles and analyzed in 2 treatment cohorts: Enneking-appropriate (EA) and Enneking-inappropriate (EI) cohorts. Patients were categorized as EA when the final pathological assessment of the margin matched the Enneking recommendation; otherwise, they were categorized as EI. METHODS Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data (Student t-test, chi-square, and Fisher exact tests). Recurrence and survival data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank tests, and multivariate Cox proportional hazard modeling. RESULTS A total of 166 patients (55 female and 111 male patients) with mobile spine chordoma were included. The median patient follow-up was 2.6 years (range 1 day to 22.5 years). Fifty-eight (41%) patients were EA and 84 (59%) patients were EI. The type of biopsy (p < 0.001), spinal location (p = 0.018), and if the patient received adjuvant therapy (p < 0.001) were significantly different between the 2 cohorts. Overall, 58 (35%) patients developed local recurrence and 57 (34%) patients died. Median survival was 7.0 years postoperative: 8.4 years postoperative for EA patients and 6.4 years postoperative for EI patients (p = 0.023). The multivariate analysis showed that the EI cohort was significantly associated with an increased risk of local recurrence in comparison with the EA cohort (HR 7.02; 95% CI 2.96–16.6; p < 0.001), although no significant difference in survival was observed. CONCLUSIONS EA resection plays a major role in decreasing the risk for local recurrence in patients with chordoma of the mobile spine.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3