Endoscopic third ventriculostomy with or without choroid plexus coagulation for myelomeningocele-associated hydrocephalus: systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Omar Abdelsimar T.123,Espiritu Adrian I.456,Spears Julian12

Affiliation:

1. Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto;

2. Division of Neurosurgery, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto;

3. Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, College of Medicine and Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila;

4. Division of Adult Neurology, Department of Neurosciences, College of Medicine and Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila; and

5. Department of Clinical Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, Philippines

6. Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada;

Abstract

OBJECTIVE While ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) insertion is the standard treatment for myelomeningocele-associated hydrocephalus (MAH), it can be complicated by infection and shunt malfunction. As such, endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV), with or without choroid plexus coagulation (CPC), has been proposed as an alternative. The aim of this review was to determine the success, technical failure, and complication rates of ETV with or without CPC in patients with MAH. METHODS PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched from inception to June 2020 for case series, cohort studies, or randomized controlled trials reporting success, technical failure, or complication rates. Random-effects analysis was performed to determine the estimates for these outcome measures. Studies were evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for quality and risk of bias. RESULTS Thirteen studies with a total of 325 patients who underwent either ETV or ETV+CPC were included in the review. Using random-effects modeling, the pooled estimate of the success rate was 56% (95% CI 44%–68%, I2 = 78%), while the technical failure rate was 2% (95% CI 0%–6%, I2 = 32%). The estimate for the success rate had high heterogeneity, due to the type of surgical intervention (ETV vs ETV+CPC, p < 0.001). Random-effects analysis of 9 studies with 117 patients who underwent ETV alone yielded an estimated success rate of 48% (95% CI 0.39–0.57, I2 = 0%), while analysis of 4 studies with 166 patients who underwent ETV+CPC revealed a success rate of 75% (95% CI 67%–82%, I2 = 21%). The estimates for the mild/moderate, severe, and fatal complication rates were 0 (95% CI 0%–4%, I2 = 0%), 2% (95% CI 0%–10%, I2 = 52%), and 0 (95% CI 0%–1%, I2 = 0%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS ETV+CPC was associated with a higher success rate than ETV alone for MAH in a meta-analysis of published studies. ETV, with or without CPC, was technically feasible and safe for this patient population.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3