Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: 3-year follow-up results

Author:

Becske Tibor12,Potts Matthew B.13,Shapiro Maksim12,Kallmes David F.4,Brinjikji Waleed4,Saatci Isil5,McDougall Cameron G.6,Szikora István7,Lanzino Giuseppe4,Moran Christopher J.8,Woo Henry H.9,Lopes Demetrius K.10,Berez Aaron L.11,Cher Daniel J.12,Siddiqui Adnan H.13,Levy Elad I.13,Albuquerque Felipe C.6,Fiorella David J.9,Berentei Zsolt7,Marosföi Miklós7,Cekirge Saruhan H.5,Nelson Peter K.13

Affiliation:

1. Departments of Radiology,

2. Neurology, and

3. Neurological Surgery, Neurointerventional Service, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York;

4. Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota;

5. Department of Radiology, Bayindir Hospital, Ankara, Turkey;

6. Department of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona;

7. National Institute of Neurosciences, Budapest, Hungary;

8. Division of Interventional Neuroradiology, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri;

9. Department of Neurosurgery, Stony Brook Hospital, Stony Brook, New York;

10. Department of Neurological Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois;

11. Alembic, LLC, Mountain View;

12. Wild Iris Consulting, Palo Alto, California; and

13. Departments of Neurological Surgery and Radiology, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York

Abstract

OBJECTIVEThe long-term effectiveness of endovascular treatment of large and giant wide-neck aneurysms using traditional endovascular techniques has been disappointing, with high recanalization and re-treatment rates. Flow diversion with the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) has been recently used as a stand-alone therapy for complex aneurysms, showing significant improvement in effectiveness while demonstrating a similar safety profile to stent-supported coil treatment. However, relatively little is known about its long-term safety and effectiveness. Here the authors report on the 3-year safety and effectiveness of flow diversion with the PED in a prospective cohort of patients with large and giant internal carotid artery aneurysms enrolled in the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms (PUFS) trial.METHODSThe PUFS trial is a prospective study of 107 patients with 109 aneurysms treated with the PED. Primary effectiveness and safety end points were demonstrated based on independently monitored 180-day clinical and angiographic data. Patients were enrolled in a long-term follow-up protocol including 1-, 3-, and 5-year clinical and imaging follow-up. In this paper, the authors report the midstudy (3-year) effectiveness and safety data.RESULTSAt 3 years posttreatment, 74 subjects with 76 aneurysms underwent catheter angiography as required per protocol. Overall, complete angiographic aneurysm occlusion was observed in 71 of these 76 aneurysms (93.4% cure rate). Five aneurysms were re-treated, using either coils or additional PEDs, for failure to occlude, and 3 of these 5 were cured by the 3-year follow-up. Angiographic cure with one or two treatments of Pipeline embolization alone was therefore achieved in 92.1%. No recanalization of a previously completely occluded aneurysm was noted on the 3-year angiograms. There were 3 (2.6%) delayed device- or aneurysm-related serious adverse events, none of which led to permanent neurological sequelae. No major or minor late-onset hemorrhagic or ischemic cerebrovascular events or neurological deaths were observed in the 6-month through 3-year posttreatment period. Among 103 surviving patients, 85 underwent functional outcome assessment in which modified Rankin Scale scores of 0–1 were demonstrated in 80 subjects.CONCLUSIONSPipeline embolization is safe and effective in the treatment of complex large and giant aneurysms of the intracranial internal carotid artery. Unlike more traditional endovascular treatments, flow diversion results in progressive vascular remodeling that leads to complete aneurysm obliteration over longer-term follow-up without delayed aneurysm recanalization and/or growth.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT00777088 (clinicaltrials.gov)

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Subject

Genetics,Animal Science and Zoology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3