Deep and brainstem cavernomas: a consecutive 8-year series

Author:

Mathiesen Tiit,Edner Göran,Kihlström Lars

Abstract

Object. The goal of this study was to provide epidemiological and clinical data on the management of cavernomas of the basal ganglia and brainstem from a long-term series at one institution. Methods. All 68 patients who were referred to the authors' department between 1992 and 2000 for deep cavernomas were evaluated by clinic examinations, review of neuroimaging examinations, and review of charts and operative notes. Twenty-nine patients underwent microsurgical procedures, which carried a 69% risk of transitory neurological deterioration. Radical excision was achieved in 25 of these patients, as determined by a review of neuroimages; the remaining four patients all experienced new hemorrhages that led to increased morbidity or even to mortality. Surgical results were better if surgery was performed early, within 1 month posthemorrhage, than if operations were postponed. In selected patients, deep lesions not reaching a pial surface could be safely removed from the thalamus, basal ganglia, or medulla oblongata. Of five patients who underwent gamma knife surgery, two experienced hemorrhages, one at 2 and the other at 5 years following treatment. Patients who did not undergo surgery had a yearly incidence of hemorrhage that was 2% in cases of incidental cavernomas and 7% in symptomatic ones. Conclusions. Over the long term, outcomes were worse following conservative treatment or shunt insertion surgery than after microsurgery of symptomatic cavernomas. Incidental cavernomas carried a low risk of neurological deterioration. Surgery should follow generally accepted indications, but only with the confidence that total removal can be safely achieved. Surgery that is performed within 10 to 30 days following ictus may be preferable to delayed surgery.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Cited by 187 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3