Differences in the surgical management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis based on self-reported sex: analysis of the CSORN prospective DLS study

Author:

Walker Taryn N.1,Urquhart Jennifer C.1,Rasoulinejad Parham1,Singh Supriya1,Glennie R. Andrew2,Fisher Charles G.3,Rampersaud Y. Raja4,Abraham Edward5,Street John3,Dvorak Marcel F.3,Paquette Scott6,Charest-Morin Raphaele3,Dea Nicolas6,Gelinas-Phaneuf Nicholas7,Kwon Brian K.3,Bailey Christopher S.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada;

2. Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada;

3. Departments of Orthopaedics and

4. Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;

5. Department of Surgery, Canada East Spine Centre, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada; and

6. Neurosurgery, Vancouver Spine Surgery Institute (VSSI), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;

7. Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital de L’Enfant-Jésus, Québec City, Québec, Canada

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) reliably improves patient-reported quality of life; however, patient population heterogeneity, in addition to other factors, ensures ongoing equipoise in choosing the ideal surgical treatment. Surgeon preference for fusion or decompression alone influences surgical treatment decision-making. Meanwhile, at presentation, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) differ considerably between females and males. The aims of this study were to determine whether there exists a difference in the rates of decompression and fusion versus decompression alone based on patient-reported sex, and to determine if widely accepted indications for fusion justify any observed differences or if surgeon preference plays a role. METHODS This study is a retrospective cohort analysis of patients enrolled in the Canadian Spine Outcomes Research Network (CSORN) DLS study, a multicentered Canadian prospective study, investigating the surgical management and outcome of DLS. Decompression and fusion rates, patient characteristics, preoperative PROMs, and radiographic measures were compared between males and females before and after propensity score matching. RESULTS In the unmatched cohort, female patients were more likely to undergo decompression and fusion than male patients. Females were more likely to have the recognized indications for fusion, including kyphotic disc angle, higher spondylolisthesis grade and slip percentage, and patient-reported back pain. Other radiographic findings associated with the decision to fuse, including facet effusion, facet distraction, or facet angle, were not more prevalent in females. After propensity score matching for demographic and radiographic characteristics, similar proportions of male and female patients underwent decompression and fusion and decompression alone. CONCLUSIONS Although it remains unclear who should or should not undergo fusion, in addition to surgical decompression of DLS, female patients undergo fusion at a higher rate than their male counterparts. After matching baseline radiographic factors indicating fusion, this analysis showed that the decision to fuse was not biased by sex differences. Rather, the higher proportion of females undergoing fusion is largely explained by the radiographic and clinical indications for fusion, suggesting that specific clinical and anatomical features of this condition are indeed different between sexes.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Reference35 articles.

1. Degenerative displacement of lumbar vertebrae. A 25-year follow-up study in Framingham;Kauppila LI,1998

2. Effect of preoperative symptom duration on outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: a Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network registry study;Cushnie D,2019

3. Factors associated with using an interbody fusion device for low-grade lumbar degenerative versus isthmic spondylolisthesis: a retrospective cohort study;Inculet C,2021

4. Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial;Weinstein JN,2006

5. A randomized, controlled trial of fusion surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis;Försth P,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3