An ACGME-based comparison of neurosurgical and orthopedic resident training in adult spine surgery via a case volume and hours-based analysis

Author:

Lad Meeki1,Gupta Raghav12,Para Ashok1,Gupta Arjun1,White Michael D.3,Agarwal Nitin3,Moore Justin M.4,Heary Robert F.5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, Rutgers–New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey;

2. Department of Neurosurgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California;

3. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;

4. Neurosurgical Service, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and

5. Department of Neurosurgery, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, New Jersey

Abstract

OBJECTIVE In a 2014 analysis of orthopedic and neurological surgical case logs published by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), it was reported that graduating neurosurgery residents performed more than twice the number of spinal procedures in their training compared with graduating orthopedic residents. There has, however, been no follow-up assessment of this trend. Moreover, whether this gap in case volume equates to a similar gap in procedural hours has remained unstudied. Given the association between surgical volume and outcomes, evaluating the status of this disparity has value. Here, the authors assess trends in case volume and procedural hours in adult spine surgery for graduating orthopedic and neurological surgery residents from 2014 to 2019. METHODS A retrospective analysis of ACGME case logs from 2014 to 2019 for graduating orthopedic and neurological surgery residents was conducted for adult spine surgeries. Case volume was converted to operative hours by using periprocedural times from the 2019 Medicare/Medicaid Physician Fee Schedule. Graduating residents’ spinal cases and hours, averaged over the study period, were compared between the two specialties by using 2-tailed Welch’s unequal variances t-tests (α = 0.05). Longitudinal trends in each metric were assessed by linear regression followed by cross-specialty comparisons via tests for equality of slopes. RESULTS From 2014 to 2019, graduating neurosurgical residents logged 6.8 times as many spinal cases as their orthopedic counterparts, accruing 431.6 (95% CI 406.49–456.61) and 63.8 (95% CI 57.08–70.56) cases (p < 0.001), respectively. Accordingly, graduating neurosurgical residents logged 6.1 times as many spinal procedural hours as orthopedic surgery residents, accruing 1020.7 (95% CI 964.70–1076.64) and 166.6 (95% CI 147.76–185.35) hours (p < 0.001), respectively. Over these 5 years, both fields saw a linear increase in graduating residents’ adult spinal case volumes and procedural hours, and these growth rates were higher for neurosurgery (+16.2 cases/year vs +4.4 cases/year, p < 0.001; +36.4 hours/year vs +12.4 hours/year, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Graduating neurosurgical residents accumulated substantially greater adult spinal case volumes and procedural hours than their orthopedic counterparts from 2014 to 2019. This disparity has been widened by a higher rate of growth in adult spinal cases among neurosurgery residents. Accordingly, targeted efforts to increase spinal exposure for orthopedic surgery residents—such as using cross-specialty collaboration—should be explored.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference48 articles.

1. Variability in surgical case volume of orthopaedic surgery residents: 2007 to 2013;Gil;J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2016

2. The impact of provider volume on the outcomes after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis;Dasenbrock;Neurosurgery,2012

3. Preoperative planning simulator for spinal deformity surgeries;Aubin;Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2008

4. Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008;Rajaee;Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2012

5. The impact of provider volume on mortality after intracranial tumor resection;Cowan;Neurosurgery,2003

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3