Delayed nerve reconstruction for brachial plexus injuries: is the risk worth the reward?

Author:

Wong Alvin1,Lee Ying-Hsuan2,Chang Tommy Nai-Jen2,Chuang David Chwei-Chin2,Lu Johnny Chuieng-Yi2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia; and

2. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Division of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Nerve reconstruction after 6 months of denervation time in brachial plexus injuries (BPIs) can be inconsistent. A dilemma exists when the use of critical donor nerves for nerve transfers may lead to unreliable outcomes that would waste the donor nerve. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of elbow and shoulder function in patients with BPIs receiving nerve reconstruction in the delayed setting (i.e., 6–12 months after injury). METHODS Data from patients with delayed BPIs who received a nerve transfer (including proximal and distal nerve transfer/grafting) at a tertiary medical center were retrospectively collected from January 1999 to March 2020. Demographics, extent of injury, mechanism of injury, and reconstructive methods were collected. Patients were categorized into two groups: non–pan-plexus BPI (C5–6, C5–7, and C5–8) and pan-plexus BPI (C5–T1). Acceptable outcome was defined as elbow flexion ≥ M3 status or shoulder abduction ≥ 60°. RESULTS Sixty-four patients were included in the study. The average time from injury to nerve reconstruction was 236 (range 180–441) days, and the average follow-up time was 66 months. In the non–pan-plexus BPI group (n = 43 patients), 74.4% of patients demonstrated M3 elbow flexion, and 48.8% of patients demonstrated M4 elbow flexion. Double fascicular transfer yielded better results and faster recovery than a single fascicular transfer. In the pan-plexus BPI group (n = 21 patients), 38.1% of patients reached M3 elbow flexion and 23.8% attained M4 elbow flexion. In the non–pan-plexus BPI group, the recovery rate of acceptable shoulder abduction was 53.5%, but only 23.5% of pan-plexus patients with BPI achieved acceptable shoulder abduction. CONCLUSIONS Nerve reconstruction can effectively restore functional elbow flexion and acceptable shoulder abduction in non–pan-plexus patients with BPI in the delayed setting. However, neither acceptable elbow flexion nor shoulder abduction could be consistently achieved in pan-plexus BPI. Judicious use of the donor nerves in pan-plexus injuries is required, in addition to preserving a donor nerve for a backup plan such as free-functioning muscle transplantation or tendon transfers.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Subject

Genetics,Animal Science and Zoology

Reference29 articles.

1. Management of adult brachial plexus injuries;Hill JR,2021

2. Pain relief from preganglionic injury to the brachial plexus by late intercostal nerve transfer;Berman J,1996

3. Indirect cost of traumatic brachial plexus injuries in the United States;Hong TS,2019

4. The psychological impact of adult traumatic brachial plexus injury;Landers ZA,2018

5. Timing of surgery in traumatic brachial plexus injury: a systematic review;Martin E,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3