Intraoperative diagnosis of facial schwannomas: a multicenter summation of clinical experience, preoperative avoidance, and intraoperative management protocol

Author:

Lewis Daniel123,Hannan Cathal John124,Plitt Aaron R.56,Snyder Lauren Rose7,Richardson George8,King Andrew T.124,Hammerbeck-Ward Charlotte1,Pathmanaban Omar N.123,Neff Brian A.56,Driscoll Colin L.56,Van Gompel Jamie J.56,Carlson Matthew L.56,Lane John I.56,Lloyd Simon K.91011,Freeman Simon R.910,Laitt Roger D.12,Abdulla Sarah12,Siripurapu Rekha12,Potter Gillian M.12,Link Michael J.56,Rutherford Scott A.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neuroscience, Manchester;

2. Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Manchester;

3. Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester;

4. Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, United Kingdom;

5. Departments of Neurologic Surgery and

6. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota;

7. University of Manchester;

8. School of Medicine, University of Liverpool;

9. Department of Otolaryngology, Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester;

10. Department of Otolaryngology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester;

11. Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester; and

12. Department of Neuroradiology, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neuroscience, Manchester, United Kingdom

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Preoperative differentiation of facial nerve schwannoma (FNS) from vestibular schwannoma (VS) can be challenging, and failure to differentiate between these two pathologies can result in potentially avoidable facial nerve injury. This study presents the combined experience of two high-volume centers in the management of intraoperatively diagnosed FNSs. The authors highlight clinical and imaging features that can distinguish FNS from VS and provide an algorithm to help manage intraoperatively diagnosed FNS. METHODS Operative records of 1484 presumed sporadic VS resections between January 2012 and December 2021 were reviewed, and patients with intraoperatively diagnosed FNSs were identified. Clinical data and preoperative imaging were retrospectively reviewed for features suggestive of FNS, and factors associated with good postoperative facial nerve function (House-Brackmann [HB] grade ≤ 2) were identified. A preoperative imaging protocol for suspected VS and recommendations for surgical decision-making following an intraoperative FNS diagnosis were created. RESULTS Nineteen patients (1.3%) with FNSs were identified. All patients had normal facial motor function preoperatively. In 12 patients (63%), preoperative imaging demonstrated no features suggestive of FNS, with the remainder showing subtle enhancement of the geniculate/labyrinthine facial segment, widening/erosion of the fallopian canal, or multiple tumor nodules in retrospect. Eleven (57.9%) of the 19 patients underwent a retrosigmoid craniotomy, and in the remaining patients, a translabyrinthine (n = 6) or transotic (n = 2) approach was used. Following FNS diagnosis, 6 (32%) of the tumors underwent gross-total resection (GTR) and cable nerve grafting, 6 (32%) underwent subtotal resection (STR) and bony decompression of the meatal facial nerve segment, and 7 (36%) underwent bony decompression only. All patients undergoing subtotal debulking or bony decompression exhibited normal postoperative facial function (HB grade I). At the last clinical follow-up, patients who underwent GTR with a facial nerve graft had HB grade III (3 of 6 patients) or IV facial function. Tumor recurrence/regrowth occurred in 3 patients (16%), all of whom had been treated with either bony decompression or STR. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative diagnosis of an FNS during a presumed VS resection is rare, but its incidence can be reduced further by maintaining a high index of suspicion and undertaking further imaging in patients with atypical clinical or imaging features. If an intraoperative diagnosis does occur, conservative surgical management with bony decompression of the facial nerve only is recommended, unless there is significant mass effect on surrounding structures.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Subject

Genetics,Animal Science and Zoology

Reference45 articles.

1. Facial nerve schwannomas: review of 80 cases over 25 years at Mayo Clinic;Carlson ML,2016

2. Evolution in the management of facial nerve schwannoma;Wilkinson EP,2011

3. Clinical and radiological guidance in managing facial nerve schwannomas;Doshi J,2015

4. The many faces of facial nerve schwannoma;Wiggins RH III,2006

5. Facial schwannoma: results of a large case series and review;McMonagle B,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3