RECO Flow Restoration Device Versus Solitaire FR With the Intention for Thrombectomy Study (REDIRECT): a prospective randomized controlled trial

Author:

Cao Jie1,Lin Hang2,Lin Min2,Ke Kaifu3,Zhang Yunfeng3,Zhang Yong4,Zheng Weihong5,Chen Xingyu5,Wang Wei6,Zhang Meng7,Xuan Jinggang1,Peng Ya1,_ _

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, The First People’s Hospital of Changzhou/The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou;

2. Department of Neurology, Fuzhou General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command, Fuzhou;

3. Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong;

4. Department of Neurology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao;

5. Department of Neurology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen;

6. Department of Imaging, Yangzhou No. 1 People’s Hospital, Yangzhou; and

7. Department of CCU, Daping Hospital, Chongqing, People’s Republic of China

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The RECO flow restoration (FR) device is a new stent retriever designed for rapid flow restoration in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO). Here, the authors compared the efficacy and safety of the RECO device with the predicate Solitaire FR stent retriever. METHODS The RECO Flow Restoration Device Versus Solitaire FR With the Intention for Thrombectomy Study (REDIRECT) was a multicenter, prospective, open randomized controlled trial. Patients with acute LVO at 7 Chinese stroke centers participated in the study. The primary efficacy endpoint was defined as a modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) reperfusion grade ≥ 2 within three passes. The primary safety endpoint comprised any serious adverse device effect, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and any serious adverse event (SAE; defined as cerebral palsy or death) within 24 hours after the procedure. The secondary efficacy endpoints consisted of functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0–2), procedure duration, and 90-day all-cause mortality. RESULTS Between January 2014 and August 2016, 67 patients were randomly allocated to the RECO group and 69 patients to the Solitaire FR group. The primary efficacy endpoint (mTICI grade ≥ 2 within three passes) was similar in the two treatment groups (91% vs 87%, respectively, p = 0.5861), and the rate of reperfusion with an mTICI grade 2b/3 was 87% versus 75% (p = 0.1272). There were no serious adverse device effects in any patient. The rates of sICH (1.5% vs 7.2%, p = 0.1027) and SAEs (6.0% vs 1.4%, p = 0.2050) within 24 hours after the procedure were similar in the two treatment groups. There was no significant difference in the rate of functional independence (63% vs 46%, p = 0.0609) or 90-day all-cause mortality (13% vs 23%, p = 0.1848) or in procedure duration (85.39 ± 47.01 vs 89.94 ± 53.34 minutes, p = 0.5986) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS The RECO stent retriever is effective and safe as a mechanical thrombectomy device for AIS due to LVO. Clinical trial registration no.: NCT01983644 (clinicaltrials.gov)

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Subject

Genetics,Animal Science and Zoology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3