Comparison between neuroimaging classifications and histopathological diagnoses using an international multicenter brain tumor magnetic resonance imaging database

Author:

Julià-Sapé Margarida1,Acosta Dionisio1,Majós Carles1,Moreno-Torres Àngel1,Wesseling Pieter1,Acebes Juan José1,Griffiths John R.1,Arús Carles1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Science Faculty Unit, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain; Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Caracas, Venezuela; Institut de Diagnòstic per la Imatge, Hospital Duran i Reynals, Consorci Sanitari i Universitari de Bellvitge, L’Hospitalet del Llobregat, Spain; Centre Diagnòstic Pedralbes–Centre de Tractament amb Isòtops Radioactius, Esplugues del Llobregat...

Abstract

Object The aim of this study was to estimate the accuracy of routine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging studies in the classification of brain tumors in terms of both cell type and grade of malignancy. Methods The authors retrospectively assessed the correlation between neuroimaging classifications and histopathological diagnoses by using multicenter database records from 393 patients with brain tumors. An ontology was devised to establish diagnostic agreement. Each tumor category was compared with the corresponding histopathological diagnoses by dichotomization. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPVs and NPVs, respectively), and the Wilson 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each were calculated. In routine reporting of MR imaging examinations, tumor types and grades were classified with a high specificity (85.2–100%); sensitivity varied, depending on the tumor type and grade, alone or in combination. The recognition of broad diagnostic categories (neuroepithelial or meningeal lesions) was highly sensitive, whereas when both detailed type and grade were considered, sensitivity diverged, being highest in low-grade meningioma (sensitivity 100%, 95% CI 96.2–100.0%) and lowest in high-grade meningioma (sensitivity 0.0%, 95% CI 0.0–65.8%) and low-grade oligodendroglioma (sensitivity 15%, 95% CI 5.2–36.0%). In neuroepithelial tumors, sensitivity was inversely related to the precision in reporting of grade and cellular origin; “glioma” was a frequent neuroimaging classification associated with higher sensitivity in the corresponding category. The PPVs varied among categories, in general being greater than their prevalence in this dataset. The NPV was high in all categories (69.8–100%). Conclusions The PPVs and NPVs provided in this study may be used as estimates of posttest probabilities of diagnostic accuracy using MR imaging. This study targets the need for noninvasively increasing sensitivity in categorizing most brain tumor types while retaining high specificity, especially in the differentiation of high- and low-grade glial tumor classes.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3