Long-term outcome of endovascular treatment for indirect carotid-cavernous fistulas

Author:

Baharvahdat Humain12,Qoorchi Moheb Seraj Farid2,Al-Raaisi Amira1,Blanc Raphael1,Najafi Sajjad3,Mirbolouk Mohammad Hossein4,Redjem Hocine1,Ebrahimnia Feizollah2,Escalard Simon1,Zabihyan Samira2,Desilles Jean-Philipe1,Mowla Ashkan5,Boisseau Willian1,Mazighi Mikael1,Smajda Stanislas1,Piotin Michel1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France;

2. Department of Neurosurgery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran;

3. Department of Neurosurgery, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Sari, Iran;

4. Department of Neurosurgery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Tehran, Iran; and

5. Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Endovascular treatment (EVT) is the primary approach used to treat indirect carotid-cavernous fistulas (CCFs). In this study, the authors evaluated the immediate and long-term efficacy and safety of different endovascular techniques for indirect CCFs. METHODS The databases of two endovascular centers were retrospectively reviewed to collect the patients with indirect CCFs treated using endovascular techniques between 2013 and 2023. Demographics, clinical presentation, CCF features, EVT characteristics, and clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated and analyzed. The analysis was performed to compare the clinical and radiological data between different endovascular approaches and different embolic materials. RESULTS Ninety-eight patients were included in the study. EVT was successful in 95 patients (96.9%). Immediate complete obliteration of the CCF was achieved in 93.9% of patients, with 98% undergoing embolization with liquid embolic agents (LEAs) and 95.6% undergoing coiling alone. Complete CCF obliteration was higher in the transvenous than in the transarterial approach (94.3% vs 75%, p = 0.010). At ≥ 6 months follow-up, complete CCF obliteration was achieved in all patients (100%). The rate of procedure-related complications was higher following LEAs than with coiling alone (32.0% vs 15.6%). New cranial nerve (CN) palsy was diagnosed in 26.0% and 2.2% after embolization with LEAs and coiling alone, respectively (p = 0.001), with complete CN palsy recovery in 78.6%. Procedure-related intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 3 patients (3.1%). Two patients experienced an ischemic stroke following Onyx migration into the internal carotid artery. Ocular symptoms improved in 93% (83/89) of the patients who were followed. CONCLUSIONS In this study, complete obliteration of an indirect CCF was achieved in more than 90% of patients. Despite the occurrence of some new postprocedural ocular CN palsy, ocular symptoms improved in most patients in long-term follow-up. The transvenous approach was the most effective method for treating the indirect CCF. Coiling was safer than LEAs for the embolization of the indirect CCF.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Reference29 articles.

1. Classification and treatment of spontaneous carotid-cavernous sinus fistulas;Barrow DL,1985

2. Long-term outcomes of endovascular treatment of indirect carotid cavernous fistulae: superior efficacy, safety, and durability of transvenous coiling over other techniques;Alexander MD,2019

3. Transvenous embolization of dural carotid cavernous fistulas: the role of liquid embolic agents in association with coils on patient outcomes;de Castro-Afonso LH,2018

4. Dural carotid cavernous fistula: definitive endovascular management and long-term follow-up;Meyers PM,2002

5. Results of transvenous embolization of cavernous dural arteriovenous fistula: a single-center experience with emphasis on complications and management;Kim DJ,2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3