Methods of experimental and clinical assessment of the relative measurement accuracy of an intracranial pressure transducer

Author:

Morgalla Matthias Hubert,Krasznai Làszlo,Dietz Klaus,Mettenleiter Holger,Deininger Martin,Grote Ernst Heinrich

Abstract

✓ The assessment of the actual measurement accuracy of an intracranial pressure (ICP) transducer is imperative but still very difficult in practice. The authors tested the Codman MicroSensor ICP transducer experimentally. Additionally, a bedside test for assessment of measurement accuracy was used before and after clinical monitoring. For laboratory testing, seven new transducers were examined for measurement accuracy at increasing pressures ranging from 0 to 75 mm Hg. Drift was evaluated for 10 days at six different pressure levels ranging from 0 to 50 mm Hg. Temperature drift was assessed over a temperature range from 20 to 45°C. The percentage absolute difference was used in the assessment of measurement accuracy. For clinical testing, measurement accuracy was assessed intraoperatively just before the insertion of the transducer and in an open water bath after its explantation, at 10 cm H2O both times. The maximum percentage absolute difference was 9% at a pressure of 10 mm Hg, and declined toward 2.3% at a pressure of 75 mm Hg. The maximum drift over 10 days was −4 mm Hg. Within the range of 30 to 40°C, temperature drift was negligible. Over a period of 2 years, between June 1997 and June 1999, 40 ICP transducers were implanted in 35 patients by one surgeon. Of these devices, a malfunction was detected in two of them by testing them in a water bath before insertion. Experimental and clinical results indicate that this miniature strain-gauge transducer measures accurately; however, control readings for the probe by means of measurement in an open water bath just before insertion are strongly recommended.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3