Multidisciplinary approach to cerebrospinal fluid shunt infection with an appeal for attention to details in assessment and standardization in reporting

Abstract

Object The goal of this study was to evaluate the problems encountered in monitoring CSF shunt infection, including the collection, analysis, and reporting of data. The authors propose a system that would produce more accurate, and hence more meaningful, information on shunt infection than do the methodologies and customs now in common use. Methods The authors reviewed and analyzed 19 years of quarterly records of a committee that has addressed CSF shunt infection in an ongoing manner. Results There are strong incentives, political and otherwise, to identify low rates of CSF shunt infection. Details of the composition and operation of a multidisciplinary approach to CSF shunt infection are summarized. Many factors affect the occurrence of shunt infection and its accurate assessment and reporting. Easily accessible sources for the identification of cases of shunt infections and for the assessment of an at-risk population often contain discrepancies in significant numbers. Conclusions Multidisciplinary oversight of the entire matter of CSF shunt infection enhances the chances for collecting accurate data, identifying causes of infection, and developing effective preventative strategies. Valid data require a mechanism for finding all individuals within the at-risk pool; the accurate identification of patients who had shunt infections; standard, pragmatic, and robust criteria for diagnosis of shunt infection; and multidisciplinary oversight of the entire process.