Treatment of restenosis after lumbar decompression surgery: decompression versus decompression and fusion

Author:

Miyahara Junya12,Yoshida Yuichi23,Nishizawa Mitsuhiro23,Nakarai Hiroyuki24,Kumanomido Yudai24,Tozawa Keiichiro25,Yamato Yukimasa25,Iizuka Masaaki26,Yu Jim27,Sasaki Katsuyuki28,Oshina Masahito29,Kato So12,Doi Toru12,Taniguchi Yuki12,Matsubayashi Yoshitaka12,Higashikawa Akiro24,Takeshita Yujiro25,Ono Takashi26,Hara Nobuhiro27,Azuma Seiichi28,Kawamura Naohiro23,Tanaka Sakae1,Oshima Yasushi12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo;

2. University of Tokyo Spine Group (UTSG), Tokyo;

3. Department of Spine and Orthopedic Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo;

4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kanto Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa;

5. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Kanagawa;

6. Department of Spinal Surgery, Japan Community Health-care Organization Tokyo Shinjuku Medical Center, Tokyo;

7. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Musashino Hospital, Tokyo;

8. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Saitama Red Cross Hospital, Saitama; and

9. Spine Center, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare perioperative complications and postoperative outcomes between patients with lumbar recurrent stenosis without lumbar instability and radiculopathy who underwent decompression surgery and those who underwent decompression with fusion surgery. METHODS For this retrospective study, the authors identified 2606 consecutive patients who underwent posterior surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis at eight affiliated hospitals between April 2017 and June 2019. Among these patients, those with a history of prior decompression surgery and central canal restenosis with cauda equina syndrome were included in the study. Those patients with instability or radiculopathy were excluded. The patients were divided between the decompression group and decompression with fusion group. The demographic characteristics, numerical rating scale score for low-back pain, incidence rates of lower-extremity pain and lower-extremity numbness, Oswestry Disability Index score, 3-level EQ-5D score, and patient satisfaction rate were compared between the two groups using the Fisher’s exact probability test for nominal variables and the Student t-test for continuous variables, with p < 0.05 as the level of statistical significance. RESULTS Forty-six patients met the inclusion criteria (35 males and 11 females; 19 patients underwent decompression and 27 decompression and fusion; mean ± SD age 72.5 ± 8.8 years; mean ± SD follow-up 18.8 ± 6.0 months). Demographic data and perioperative complication rates were similar. The percentages of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important differences for patient-reported outcomes or satisfaction rate at 1 year were similar. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with central canal stenosis who underwent revision, the short-term outcomes of the patients who underwent decompression were comparable to those of the patients who underwent decompression and fusion. Decompression surgery may be effective for patients without instability or radiculopathy.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3