Affiliation:
1. Department of Neurosurgery;
2. Matthew Gfeller Sport-Related TBI Research Center, Department of Exercise and Sport Science; and
3. School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Abstract
OBJECTIVESkull fractures represent a common source of morbidity in the pediatric trauma population. This study characterizes the type of follow-up that these patients receive and discusses predictive factors for follow-up.METHODSThe authors reviewed cases of nonoperative pediatric skull fractures at a single academic hospital between 2007 and 2017. Clinical patient and radiological fractures were recorded. Recommended neurosurgical follow-up, follow-up appointments, imaging studies, and fracture-related complications were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed to identify predictors for outpatient follow-up and imaging.RESULTSThe study included 414 patients, whose mean age was 5.2 years; 37.2% were female, and the median length of stay was 1 day (IQR 0.9–4 days). During 438 clinic visits and a median follow-up period of 8 weeks (IQR 4–12, range 1–144 weeks), 231 imaging studies were obtained, mostly head CT scans (55%). A total of 283 patients were given recommendations to attend follow-up in the clinic, and 86% were seen. Only 12 complications were detected, including 7 growing skull fractures, 2 traumatic encephaloceles, and 3 cases of hearing loss. Primary care physician (PCP) status and insurance status were associated with a recommendation of follow-up, actual follow-up compliance, and the decision to order outpatient imaging in patients both with and without intracranial hemorrhage. PCP status remained an independent predictor in each of these analyses. Follow-up compliance was not associated with a patient’s distance from home. Among patients without intracranial hemorrhage, a follow-up recommendation and actual follow-up compliance were associated with pneumocephalus and other polytraumatic injuries, and outpatient imaging was associated with a bilateral fracture. No complications were found in patients with linear fractures above the skull base in those without an intracranial hemorrhage.CONCLUSIONSPediatric nonoperative skull fractures drive a large expenditure of clinic and imaging resources to detect a relatively small profile of complications. Understanding the factors underlying the decision for clinic follow-up and additional imaging can decrease future costs, resource utilization, and radiation exposure. Factors related to injury severity and socioeconomic indicators were associated with outpatient imaging, the decision to follow up patients in the clinic, and patients’ subsequent attendance. Socioeconomic status (PCP and insurance) may affect access to appropriate neurosurgical follow-up and deserves future research attention. Patients with no intracranial hemorrhage and with a linear fracture above the skull base do not appear to be at risk for delayed complications and could be candidates for reduced follow-up and imaging.
Publisher
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
Reference62 articles.
1. Evaluation of pediatric skull fracture imaging techniques;Mulroy;Forensic Sci Int,2011
2. Posttraumatic complications in pediatric skull fracture: dural sinus thrombosis, arterial dissection, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage;Adepoju;J Neurosurg Pediatr,2017
3. Pediatric skull fractures: the need for surgical intervention, characteristics, complications, and outcomes;Bonfield;J Neurosurg Pediatr,2014
4. Transfer of children with isolated linear skull fractures: is it worth the cost?;White;J Neurosurg Pediatr,2016
5. Infants with isolated skull fracture: what are their clinical characteristics, and do they require hospitalization?;Greenes;Ann Emerg Med,1997
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献