Relationship between body mass index and sagittal vertical axis change as well as health-related quality of life in 564 patients after deformity surgery

Author:

Agarwal Nitin1,Angriman Federico2,Goldschmidt Ezequiel1,Zhou James1,Kanter Adam S.1,Okonkwo David O.1,Passias Peter G.3,Protopsaltis Themistocles4,Lafage Virginie5,Lafage Renaud5,Schwab Frank5,Bess Shay4,Ames Christopher6,Smith Justin S.7,Shaffrey Christopher I.7,Burton Douglas8,Hamilton D. Kojo1,_ _

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;

2. Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina;

3. New York Spine Institute, New York, New York;

4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University, New York, New York;

5. Spine Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York;

6. Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, California;

7. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia; and

8. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas

Abstract

OBJECTIVEObesity, a condition that is increasing in prevalence in the United States, has previously been associated with poorer outcomes following deformity surgery, including higher rates of perioperative complications such as deep and superficial infections. To date, however, no study has examined the relationship between preoperative BMI and outcomes of deformity surgery as measured by spine parameters such as the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), as well as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures such as the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Scoliosis Research Society–22 patient questionnaire (SRS-22). To this end, the authors sought to clarify the relationship between BMI and postoperative change in SVA as well as HRQoL outcomes.METHODSThe authors performed a retrospective review of a prospectively managed multicenter adult spinal deformity database collected and maintained by the International Spine Study Group (ISSG) between 2009 and 2014. The primary independent variable considered was preoperative BMI. The primary outcome was the change in SVA at 1 year after deformity surgery. Postoperative ODI and SRS-22 outcome measures were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Generalized linear models were used to model the primary and secondary outcomes at 1 year as a function of BMI at baseline, while adjusting for potential measured confounders.RESULTSIncreasing BMI (compared to BMI < 18) was not associated with change of SVA at 1 year postsurgery. However, BMIs in the obese range of 30 to 34.9 kg/m2, compared to BMI < 18 at baseline, were associated with poorer outcomes as measured by the SRS-22 score (estimated change −0.47, 95% CI −0.93 to −0.01, p = 0.04). While BMIs > 30 appeared to be associated with poorer outcomes as determined by the ODI, this correlation did not reach statistical significance.CONCLUSIONSBaseline BMI did not affect the achievable SVA at 1 year postsurgery. Further studies should evaluate whether even in the absence of a change in SVA, baseline BMIs in the obese range are associated with worsened HRQoL outcomes after spinal surgery.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference46 articles.

1. Obesity and spine surgery: relation to perioperative complications;Patel;J Neurosurg Spine,2007

2. Low preoperative serum prealbumin levels and the postoperative surgical site infection risk in elective spine surgery: a consecutive series;Salvetti;J Neurosurg,2018

3. STROBE initiative: guidelines on reporting observational studies;Malta;Rev Saude Publica,2010

4. Impact of obesity on complications, infection, and patient-reported outcomes in adult spinal deformity surgery;Soroceanu;J Neurosurg Spine,2015

5. A new piece of the puzzle to understand cervical sagittal alignment: utilizing a novel angle δ to describe the relationship among T1 vertebral body slope, cervical lordosis, and cervical sagittal alignment;Goldschmidt;Neurosurgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3