Portable MRI to assess optic chiasm decompression after endoscopic endonasal resection of sellar and suprasellar lesions

Author:

Hong Christopher S.1,Lamsam Layton A.1,Yadlapalli Vineetha2,Parasuram Nethra2,Mazurek Mercy2,Chavva Isha2,Lalwani Dheeraj2,Zabinska Julia2,Schiff Steven J.1,Manes R. Peter3,Vining Eugenia M.3,Rimmer Ryan A.3,Kimberly W. Taylor4,Sheth Kevin N.12,Omay Sacit Bulent13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven;

2. Department of Neurology, Division of Neurocritical Care and Emergency Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven;

3. Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; and

4. Department of Neurology, Division of Neurocritical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Low-field portable MRI (pMRI) is a recent technological advancement with potential for broad applications. Compared with conventional MRI, pMRI is less resource-intensive with regard to operational costs and scan time. The application of pMRI in neurosurgical oncology has not been previously described. The goal of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy of pMRI in assessing optic nerve decompression after endoscopic endonasal surgery for sellar and suprasellar pathologies. METHODS Patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal surgery for sellar and suprasellar lesions at a single institution and for whom pMRI and routine MRI were performed postoperatively were retrospectively reviewed to compare the two imaging systems. To assess the relative resolution of pMRI compared with MRI, the distance from the optic chiasm to the top of the third ventricle was measured, and the measurements were compared between paired equivalent slices on T2-weighted coronal images. The inter- and intrarater correlations were analyzed. RESULTS Twelve patients were included in this study (10 with pituitary adenomas and 2 with craniopharyngiomas) with varying degrees of optic chiasm compression on preoperative imaging. Measurements were averaged across raters before calculating agreement between pMRI and MRI, which demonstrated significant interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.78, p < 0.01). Agreement between raters within the pMRI measurements was also significantly reliable (ICC = 0.93, p < 0.01). Finally, a linear mixed-effects model was specified to demonstrate that MRI measurement could be predicted using the pMRI measurement with the patient and rater set as random effects (pMRI β coefficient = 0.80, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that resolution of pMRI is comparable to that of conventional MRI in assessing the optic chiasm position in relation to the third ventricle. Portable MRI sufficiently demonstrates decompression of the optic chiasm after endoscopic endonasal surgery. It can be an alternative strategy in cases in which cost, scan-time considerations, or lack of intraoperative MRI availability may preclude the ability to assess adequate optic nerve decompression after endoscopic endonasal surgery for sellar and suprasellar lesions.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Subject

Genetics,Animal Science and Zoology

Reference34 articles.

1. Detection of stroke by portable, low-field MRI: a milestone in medical imaging;Basser P,2022

2. Emerging ethical issues raised by highly portable MRI research in remote and resource-limited international settings;Shen FX,2021

3. Portable, bedside, low-field magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of intracerebral hemorrhage;Mazurek MH,2021

4. Portable, low-field magnetic resonance imaging enables highly accessible and dynamic bedside evaluation of ischemic stroke;Yuen MM,2022

5. Novel, compact, intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging-guided system for conventional neurosurgical operating rooms;Hadani M,2001

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3