Dissecting patterns and predictors of interhospital transfers for patients with brain metastasis

Author:

Tong Lilin12,Medeiros Lila1,Moen Erika L.3,Dhand Amar4,Bi Wenya Linda1

Affiliation:

1. Departments of Neurosurgery and

2. Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; and

3. Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire

4. Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts;

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Interhospital transfers in the acute setting may contribute to high cost, patient inconvenience, and delayed treatment. The authors sought to understand patterns and predictors in the transfer of brain metastasis patients after emergency department (ED) encounter. METHODS The authors analyzed 3037 patients with brain metastasis who presented to the ED in Massachusetts and were included in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database and State Emergency Department Database in 2018 and 2019. RESULTS The authors found that 6.9% of brain metastasis patients who presented to the ED were transferred to another facility, either directly or indirectly after admission. The sending EDs were more likely to be nonteaching hospitals without neurosurgery and radiation oncology services (p < 0.01). Transferred patients were more likely to present with neurological symptoms compared to those admitted or discharged (p < 0.01). Among those transferred, approximately 30% did not undergo a significant procedure after transfer and approximately 10% were discharged within 3 days, in addition to not undergoing significant interventions. In total, 74% of transferred patients were sent to a facility significantly farther (> 3 miles) than the nearest facility with neurosurgery and radiation oncology services. Further distance transfers were not associated with improvements in 30-day readmission rate (OR [95% CI] 0.64 [0.30–1.34] for 15–30 miles; OR [95% CI] 0.73 [0.37–1.46] for > 30 miles), 90-day readmission rate (OR [95% CI] 0.50 [0.18–1.28] for 15–30 miles; OR [95% CI] 0.53 [0.18–1.51] for > 30 miles), and length of stay (OR [95% CI] 1.21 days [0.94–1.29] for both 15–30 miles and > 30 miles) compared to close-distance transfers. CONCLUSIONS The authors identified a notable proportion of transfers without subsequent significant intervention or appreciable medical management. This may reflect ED physician discomfort with the neurological symptoms of brain metastasis. Many patients were also transferred to hospitals distant from their point of origin and demonstrated no differences in readmission rates and length of stay.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Subject

Genetics,Animal Science and Zoology

Reference21 articles.

1. Recent advances in managing brain metastasis;Kotecha R,2018

2. Brain metastasis—a distinct oncologic disease best served by an integrated multidisciplinary team approach;Moss NS,2022

3. Interhospital transfer of patients with malignant brain tumors undergoing resection is associated with routine discharge;Han JS,2022

4. Demographics and outcomes of interhospital transfer patients undergoing intracranial tumor resection: a retrospective cohort analysis;Azizkhanian I,2021

5. Identification and cost of potentially avoidable transfers to a tertiary care neurosurgery service: a pilot study;Kuhn EN,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3