Target Ultra and Nano coils in the endovascular treatment of small intracranial aneurysms (ULTRA Registry)

Author:

Jindal Gaurav1,Almardawi Ranyah1,Gupta Rishi2,Colby Geoffrey P.3,Schirmer Clemens M.4,Satti Sudhakar R.5,Pukenas Bryan6,Hui Ferdinand K.7,Caplan Justin8,Miller Timothy1,Cherian Jacob9,Aldrich Francois9,Kibria Gulam10,Simard J. Marc9,_ _

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Neuroradiology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland;

2. Department of Neurosurgery, Wellstar Health System, Marietta, Georgia;

3. Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California;

4. Department of Neurosurgery, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania;

5. Department of Neurointerventional Surgery, Christiana Care Medical Center, Newark, Delaware;

6. Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania;

7. Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Neuroradiology, and

8. Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore;

9. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore; and

10. Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The ULTRA Registry is a national multicenter prospective study designed to assess aneurysm occlusion rates and safety profiles of the Target Ultra and Nano coils in the treatment of small intracranial aneurysms (IAs). METHODS Patients with small (≤ 5 mm) ruptured and unruptured IAs were treated exclusively with Target Ultra and Nano coils. The primary endpoints were the initial rate of complete or near-complete aneurysm occlusion, aneurysm recurrence, and need for retreatment. Secondary endpoints were device- and procedure-related adverse events, hemorrhage from the coiled aneurysm at any time during follow-up, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS The ULTRA Registry included 100 patients with a mean ± SD age of 56 ± 11.6 years, of whom 75 were women and 48 presented after aneurysm rupture. The mean aneurysm size was (3.5 ± 0.9) × (2.8 ± 0.9) × (3.0 ± 1.0) mm, and the mean packing density was 34.4% ± 16.7%. Posttreatment complete or near-complete occlusion reported by an independent imaging core laboratory was seen in 92% of patients at baseline and in 87%, 87%, and 83% of patients at first, second, and final follow-up, respectively. At first, second, and final follow-up, 10%, 11%, and 15%, respectively, of patients were deemed to require retreatment. There were three procedural-related ischemic strokes and one intracranial hemorrhage from wire perforation of a parent artery not involved by the aneurysm. There were no coil-related adverse events, including no intraoperative aneurysm ruptures and no known aneurysm ruptures after coiling. CONCLUSIONS This assessment of aneurysm occlusion rates and safety profiles in ULTRA Registry study participants demonstrates excellent safety and efficacy profiles for Target Ultra and Nano coils in the treatment of small IAs.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Subject

Genetics,Animal Science and Zoology

Reference37 articles.

1. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion;Molyneux AJ,2005

2. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial;Molyneux A,2002

3. Endovascular treatment of very small (3 mm or smaller) intracranial aneurysms: report of a consecutive series and a meta-analysis;Brinjikji W,2010

4. Clinical and angiographic results of coiling of 196 very small (< or = 3 mm) intracranial aneurysms;van Rooij WJ,2009

5. Endovascular treatment of very small unruptured aneurysms: rate of procedural complications, clinical outcome, and anatomical results;Pierot L,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3