Visual outcomes comparing surgical techniques for management of severe idiopathic intracranial hypertension

Author:

Feldon Steven E.

Abstract

Object The object of this study was to compare surgical techniques for management of visual loss in idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) unresponsive to medical treatment. Methods The published literature was reviewed using electronic and manual search techniques. Articles were categorized based upon the surgical procedure performed, including optic nerve sheath decompression (ONSD), also called optic nerve sheath fenestration; intracranial venous sinus stent placement; ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement; and lumboperitoneal (LP) shunt placement. Demographic data and visual outcome of the cumulative experience were compiled and compared for each type of surgical intervention. Results Seventeen patients treated by stent placement, 31 by VP shunt placement, 44 by LP shunt placement, and 252 patients by ONSD were identified in the literature; average follow-up ranged from 11.8 months for patients treated with stents to 57.2 months for those treated with LP shunts. Improved or resolved vision deficit was noted in 38.7% of patients after VP shunt placement, 47% of patients after stent placement, 44.6% of patients after LP shunt placement, and 80% of eyes after ONSD. Visual worsening was rare for all procedures evaluated. Conclusions There is a paucity of information regarding visual outcomes from intracranial venous stent placement and cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedures. Visual outcomes from ONSD are better documented and appear to be superior to other surgical techniques for management of IIH. Further studies with improved data collection regarding visual outcomes are needed for surgical procedures other than ONSD in order to assess their possible value as treatments for visual loss in IIH.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Subject

Neurology (clinical),General Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3