Pain alleviation and functional improvement: ultra-early patient-reported outcome measures after full endoscopic spine surgery

Author:

Leyendecker Jannik12,Prasse Tobias2,Park Christine1,Payne Cathryn1,Rückels Pia13,Bieler Eliana1,Eysel Peer2,Bredow Jan23,Telfeian Albert4,Derman Peter5,Kashlan Osama6,Konakondla Sanjay7,Ogunlade John8,Hofstetter Christoph P.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington;

2. Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany;

3. Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Krankenhaus Porz am Rhein, University of Cologne, Germany;

4. Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island;

5. Texas Back Institute, Plano, Texas;

6. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;

7. Department of Neurosurgery, Geisinger Neuroscience Institute, Danville, Pennsylvania; and

8. Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Questions regarding anticipated pain improvement and functional recovery postsurgery are frequently posed in preoperative consultations. However, a lack of data characterizing outcomes for the first postoperative days only allows for anecdotal answers. Hence, the assessment of ultra-early patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is essential for patient-provider communication and patient satisfaction. The aim of this study was to elucidate this research gap by assessing and characterizing PROMs for the first days after full endoscopic spine surgery (FESS). METHODS This multicenter study included patients undergoing lumbar FESS from March 2021 to July 2023. After informed consent was provided, data were collected prospectively through a smartphone application. Patients underwent either discectomy or decompression. Analyzed parameters included demographics, surgical details, visual analog scale scores for both back and leg pain, and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score. Data were acquired daily for the 1st postoperative week, as well as after 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. RESULTS A total of 182 patients were included, of whom 102 underwent FESS discectomy and 80 underwent FESS decompression. Significant differences between the discectomy and decompression groups were found for age (mean 50.45 ± 15.28 years and 63.85 ± 13.25 years, p < 0.001; respectively), sex (p = 0.007), and surgery duration (73.45 ± 45.23 minutes vs 98.05 ± 46.47 minutes, p < 0.001; respectively). Patients in both groups reported a significant amelioration of leg pain on the 1st postoperative day (discectomy group VAS score: 6.2 ± 2.6 vs 2.4 ± 2.9, p < 0.001; decompression group: 5.3 ± 2.8 vs 1.9 ± 2.2, p < 0.001) and of back pain within the 1st postoperative week (discectomy group VAS score: 5.5 ± 2.8 vs 2.8 ± 2.2, p < 0.001; decompression group: 5.2 ± 2.7 vs 3.1 ± 2.4, p < 0.001). ODI score improvement was most pronounced at the 3-month time point (discectomy group: 21.7 ± 9.1 vs 9.3 ± 9.1, p < 0.001; decompression group: 19.3 ± 7.8 vs 9.9 ± 8.3, p < 0.001). For both groups, pain improvement within the 1st week after surgery was highly predictive of later benefits. CONCLUSIONS Ultra-early PROMs reveal an immediate pain improvement after FESS. While the benefits in pain reduction plateaued within the 1st postoperative week for both groups, functional improvements developed over a more extended period. These results illustrate a biphasic rehabilitation process wherein initial pain alleviation transitions into functional improvement over time.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Reference39 articles.

1. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango);Charles C,1997

2. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters;Makoul G,2006

3. Shared decision making in surgery: a meta-analysis of existing literature;Niburski K,2020

4. Outpatient spine surgery: defining the outcomes, value, and barriers to implementation;Pendharkar AV,2018

5. Current trends in ambulatory spine surgery: a systematic review;DelSole EM,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3