Affiliation:
1. Department of Neurosurgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC;
2. University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland;
3. Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC;
4. Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Closed suction drains, often used after posterior spinal surgery, pose a potential risk of infection. To combat this risk, many surgeons opt for a prolonged prophylactic antibiotic regimen. Since 2015, several studies have shown that prolonged prophylactic systemic antibiotics (PPSA) for drains provides no additional benefit in reducing surgical site infection (SSI) rates. However, most of these studies lacked sufficient power to make reliable conclusions. To date, there has been no meta-analysis conducted to further investigate this issue. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a regimen of PPSA reduces the incidence of deep SSIs in adult patients with closed suction drains following posterior spinal surgeries.
METHODS
The protocol of the current systematic review was registered with PROSPERO. A systematic review of the literature in PubMed (Medline), Europe PMC, Embase, and Cochrane Review databases was conducted for all relevant literature with the keywords "spine," "antibiotics," "surgical site infection," "prophylaxis," and "drain." Retrospective and prospective studies investigating the effectiveness of PPSA in patients 18 years or older who underwent posterior cervical or thoracolumbar surgery and had postoperative wound drains were included. The primary outcome was the odds ratio for deep SSI based on the intervention (PPSA vs non-PPSA). The secondary outcomes were the rates of superficial and overall SSIs.
RESULTS
From a total of 2558 titles identified from the search, 7 studies were chosen for final analysis. Three were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and 4 were retrospective reviews. A total of 2446 patients were analyzed; 1149 received a PPSA regimen and 1297 received a non-PPSA regimen. Deep SSIs occurred in 45 patients (3.9%) and 46 patients (3.5%) in the PPSA and non-PPSA groups, respectively. The odds ratio for deep SSIs in the PPSA group compared with the non-PPSA group was 1.10 (95% CI 0.69–1.74), which was not statistically significant. Additionally, there were no differences in the rates of superficial and overall SSIs. There was a trend toward increased infections with multidrug-resistant bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) in the PPSA group; however, it was not possible to perform a durable statistical analysis because of the small number of reported organisms in the selected publications.
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis demonstrates that there is no reduction in rate of deep, superficial, and overall SSIs with prolonged prophylactic antibiotics after posterior spinal surgery involving the use of closed suction drains.
Publisher
Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)
Reference25 articles.
1. Risk factors for surgical site infection after posterior lumbar spinal surgery;Liu JM,2018
2. Risk factors for acute surgical site infections after lumbar surgery: a retrospective study;Lai Q,2017
3. Incidence, prevalence, and analysis of risk factors for surgical site infection after lumbar fusion surgery: ≥2-year follow-up retrospective study;Li Z,2019
4. Prolonged post-surgical drain retention increases risk for deep wound infection after spine surgery;Pennington Z,2019
5. Closed-suction drainage in thoracolumbar spinal surgery–clinical routine without evidence? A systematic review;Schnake K,2022
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献