Conical drill bit for optimized external ventricular drain placement: a proof-of-concept study

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Despite external ventricular drain (EVD) procedures being commonplace in neurosurgical practice, suboptimal placement rates remain high, and complications are not uncommon. The angle of the EVD catheter insertion and the accuracy of the drill hole placement are major factors determining successful EVD placement that are dependent on the drill bit morphology. The standard cylindrical 2-fluted twist drill bit creates a relatively deep and narrow drill hole that requires precise positioning, has limited visibility of the drill hole bottom and restricted catheter angular adjustment range, and poses the risk of inadvertent dural puncture. To overcome the standard problems associated with EVD drill bit morphology, the authors propose novel cone-shaped drill bits for EVD placement. METHODS Conical drill bits of 30° and 45° were designed, manufactured, and tested in a simulated laboratory setting as well as in three human cadavers with intact skull, dura mater, and brain. Drill bit performance was rated by neurosurgical trainees across various domains using Likert scale–type questions. RESULTS In the laboratory, maximum drilling temperatures adjacent to the drill hole were recorded and compared for the standard drill bit and the 30° and 45° conical drill bits and were not significantly different (p = 0.631 and p = 0.326, respectively). The maximum temperature recorded directly underneath the drilling site for the 45° drill bit was significantly higher than the temperature of the standard drill bit (p = 0.043). The differences between the standard and 30° drill bits were not significant (p = 0.783). Upon cadaver testing, the drilling times with 30° and 45° conical drill bits were significantly longer than those with the standard drill bit (p = 0.036 and p = 0.002, respectively). Likert scale scores were significantly higher for the conical 30° (median [IQR] 4.7 [3.3–5]) and 45° (4 [2–5]) drill bits than for the standard drill bit (1.7 [1–2.5], p < 0.0001), indicating significantly better performance. Conical drill bits used as a "rescue" strategy allowed for an EVD catheter angular adjustment range 6 to 9 times greater than that for the standard drill bit and resulted in a zero inadvertent dural puncture rate. CONCLUSIONS The 30° conical drill bit can be safely used on its own or as a rescue tool to potentially achieve improved confidence, visualization, targeting, and precision of EVD placement while essentially eliminating the possibility of unintentional dural puncture with minimal increase in the total procedure time.