What to do with an incidental finding of a fused sagittal suture: a modified Delphi study

Author:

Chiang Sarah N.12,Reckford Jocelyn1,Alexander Allyson L.3,Birgfeld Craig B.4,Bonfield Christopher M.5,Couture Daniel E.5,David Lisa R.6,French Brooke7,Gociman Barbu8,Goldstein Jesse A.9,Golinko Michael S.10,Kestle John R. W.11,Lee Amy12,Magge Suresh N.13,Pollack Ian F.14,Rottgers S. Alex15,Runyan Christopher M.6,Smyth Matthew D.16,Wilkinson C. Corbett3,Skolnick Gary B.1,Strahle Jennifer M.17,Patel Kamlesh B.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri;

2. Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California;

3. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado;

4. Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington;

5. Departments of Neurological Surgery and

6. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina;

7. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado;

8. Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah;

9. Departments of Plastic Surgery and

10. Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee;

11. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah;

12. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington;

13. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan;

14. Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;

15. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, and

16. Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital, St. Petersburg, Florida; and

17. Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

Abstract

OBJECTIVE As many as 5% of normocephalic children may have a prematurely fused sagittal suture, yet the clinical significance and best course of management of this finding remain unclear. Providers in the Synostosis Research Group were surveyed to create a multicenter consensus on an optimal treatment and monitoring algorithm for this condition. METHODS A four-round modified Delphi method was utilized. The first two rounds consisted of anonymous surveys distributed to 10 neurosurgeons and 9 plastic surgeons with expertise in craniosynostosis across 9 institutions, and presented 3 patients (aged 3 years, 2 years, and 2 months) with incidentally discovered fused sagittal sutures, normal cephalic indices, and no parietal dysmorphology. Surgeons were queried about their preferred term for this entity and how best to manage these patients. Results were synthesized to create a treatment algorithm. The third and fourth feedback rounds consisted of open discussion of the algorithm until no further concerns arose. RESULTS Most surgeons preferred the term "premature fusion of the sagittal suture" (93%). At the conclusion of the final round, all surgeons agreed to not operate on the 3- and 2-year-old patients unless symptoms of intracranial hypertension or papilledema were present. In contrast, 50% preferred to operate on the 2-month-old. However, all agreed to utilize shared decision-making, taking into account any concerns about future head shape and neurodevelopment. Panelists agreed that patients over 18 months of age without signs or symptoms suggesting elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) should not undergo surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS Through the Delphi method, a consensus regarding management of premature fusion of the sagittal suture was obtained from a panel of North American craniofacial surgeons. Without signs or symptoms of ICP elevation, surgery is not recommended in patients over 18 months of age. However, for children younger than 18 months, surgery should be discussed with caregivers using a shared decision-making process.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Reference19 articles.

1. Surgical correction of nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis: concepts and controversies;Simpson A,2017

2. A systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic versus open treatment of craniosynostosis. Part 1: the sagittal suture;Yan H,2018

3. A review of the management of single-suture craniosynostosis, past, present, and future;Proctor MR,2019

4. School-age anthropometric and patient-reported outcomes after open or endoscopic repair of sagittal craniosynostosis;Fotouhi AR,2023

5. Premature fusion of the sagittal suture as an incidental radiographic finding in young children;Manrique M,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3