Assessing views and attitudes toward the use of extended reality and its implications in neurosurgical education: a survey of neurosurgical trainees

Author:

Gupta Nithin1,Barrington Nikki M.2,Panico Nicholas3,Brown Nolan J.4,Singh Rohin5,Rahmani Redi6,D’Amico Randy S.7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, Campbell University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lillington, North Carolina;

2. Department of Neuroscience, Chicago Medical School of Rosalind Franklin University, North Chicago, Illinois;

3. Department of Neurosurgery, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Erie, Pennsylvania;

4. Department of Neurosurgery, University of California-Irvine, Orange, California;

5. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York;

6. Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona; and

7. Department of Neurosurgery, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, New York

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Extended reality (XR) systems, including augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and mixed reality, have rapidly emerged as new technologies capable of changing the way neurosurgeons prepare for cases. Thus, the authors sought to evaluate the perspectives of neurosurgical trainees on the integration of these technologies into neurosurgical education. METHODS A 20-question cross-sectional survey was administered to neurosurgical residents and fellows to evaluate perceptions of the use of XR in neurosurgical training. Respondents evaluated each statement using a modified Likert scale (1–5). RESULTS One hundred sixteen responses were recorded, with 59.5% of participants completing more than 90% of the questions. Approximately 59% of participants reported having institutional access to XR technologies. The majority of XR users (72%) believed it was effective for simulating surgical situations, compared with only 41% for those who did not have access to XR. Most respondents (61%) agreed that XR could become a standard in neurosurgical education and a cost-effective training tool (60%). Creating patient-specific anatomical XR models was considered relatively easy by 56% of respondents. Those with XR access reported finding it easier to create intraoperative models (58%) than those without access. A significant percentage (79%) agreed on the need for technical skill training outside the operating room (OR), especially among those without XR access (82%). There was general agreement (60%) regarding the specific need for XR. XR was perceived as effectively simulating stress in the OR. Regarding clinical outcomes, 61% believed XR improved efficiency and safety and 48% agreed it enhanced resection margins. Major barriers to XR integration included lack of ample training hours and/or time to use XR amid daily clinical obligations (63%). CONCLUSIONS The data presented in this study indicate that there is broad agreement among neurosurgical trainees that XR holds potential as a training modality in neurosurgical education. Moreover, trainees who have access to XR technologies tend to hold more positive perceptions regarding the benefits of XR in their training. This finding suggests that the availability of XR resources can positively influence trainees’ attitudes and beliefs regarding the utility of these technologies in their education and training.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Reference26 articles.

1. Use of augmented reality for image-guided spine procedures;Gibby J,2020

2. Augmented reality in minimally invasive spine surgery: early efficiency and complications of percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation;Butler AJ,2023

3. Clinical accuracy and initial experience with augmented reality-assisted pedicle screw placement: the first 205 screws;Liu A,2021

4. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using augmented reality surgical navigation for percutaneous pedicle screw placement;Charles YP,2021

5. Examining the benefits of extended reality in neurosurgery: a systematic review;Dadario NB,2021

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3