Navigated intraoperative ultrasound in neuro-oncology: volumetric accuracy and correlation with high-field MRI

Author:

Aibar-Duran Juan Angel123,Salgado-López Laura4,Anka-Tugbiyele Micheal Oladotun1,Mirapeix Rosa M.3,Gallardo Alcañiz Alberto5,Patino Alvarado Juan Diego1,Rico Pereira Marta1,Rodríguez Rodríguez Rodrigo1,Munoz-Hernandez Fernando12,de Quintana-Schmidt Cristian12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain;

2. Research Institute of Sant Pau (IIB), Barcelona, Spain; and

3. The Doctorate School, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain

4. Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York;

5. Department of Anatomical Pathology, Neuropathology section, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain;

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The use of intraoperative techniques to detect residual tumors has recently become increasingly important. Intraoperative MRI has long been considered the gold standard; however, it is not widely used because of high equipment costs and long acquisition times. Consequently, real-time intraoperative ultrasound (ioUS), which is much less expensive than MRI, has gained popularity. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the capacity of ioUS to accurately determine the primary tumor volume and detect residual tumors. METHODS A prospective study of adult patients who underwent surgery for intra-axial brain tumors between November 2017 and October 2020 was performed. Navigated intraoperative ultrasound (nioUS) of the brain was used to guide tumor resection and to detect the presence of residual disease. Both convex (5–8 MHz) and linear array (6–13 MHz) probes were used. Tumor volume and residual disease were measured with nioUS and compared with MR images. A linear regression model based on a machine learning pipeline and a Bland-Altman analysis were used to assess the accuracy of nioUS versus MRI. RESULTS Eighty patients (35 females and 45 males) were included. The mean age was 58 years (range 25–80 years). A total of 88 lesions were evaluated; there were 64 (73%) gliomas, 19 (21.6%) metastases, and 5 (5.7%) other tumors, mostly located in the frontal (41%) and temporal (27%) lobes. Most of the tumors (75%) were perfectly visible on ioUS (grade 3, Mair grading system), except for those located in the insular lobe (grade 2). The regression model showed a nearly perfect correlation (R2 = 0.97, p < 0.001) between preoperative tumor volumes from both MRI and nioUS. Ultrasonographic visibility significantly influenced this correlation, which was stronger for highly visible (grade 3) tumors (p = 0.01). For residual tumors, the correlation between postoperative MRI and nioUS was weaker (R2 = 0.78, p < 0.001) but statistically significant. The Bland-Altman analysis showed minimal bias between the two techniques for pre- and postoperative scenarios, with statistically significant results for the preoperative concordance. CONCLUSIONS The authors’ findings show that most brain tumors are well delineated by nioUS and almost perfectly correlated with MRI-based measurements both pre- and postoperatively. These data support the hypothesis that nioUS is a reliable intraoperative technique that can be used for real-time monitoring of brain tumor resections and to perform volumetric analysis of residual disease.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Reference33 articles.

1. Maximizing safe resection of low- and high-grade glioma;Hervey-Jumper SL,2016

2. Extent of resection in patients with glioblastoma: limiting factors, perception of resectability, and effect on survival;Orringer D,2012

3. Fluorescence guidance and intraoperative adjuvants to maximize extent of resection;Orillac C,2021

4. Intraoperative MRI versus 5-ALA in high-grade glioma resection: a network meta-analysis;Golub D,2020

5. Application of multiparametric intraoperative ultrasound in glioma surgery;Shi J,2021

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3